How are the new wave of Chinese researchers shaping up in scholarly communication terms?

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Jie [1 ]
Chen, Dianyun [1 ]
He, Chen [1 ]
Zeng, Yuanxiang [2 ]
Nicholas, David [3 ]
Wang, Zixian [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Coll Literature & Journalism, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] CIBER Res Ltd, Newbury RG14 7RU, Berks, England
关键词
Early career researchers; Scholarly communication; Information behavior; Research evaluation; Research policy; EARLY-CAREER RESEARCHERS; BEHAVIORS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.22452/mjlis.vol25no3.4
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The study investigates the attitudes and practices of Chinese early career researchers (ECRs) in regard to all scholarly aspects, providing the findings in the context of the academic assessment policies change in China over the last decade. The data were gathered by means of an online questionnaire survey, which obtained 263 Chinese ECRs' responses. The main conclusions are: (a) journal-based indicators (e.g. journal reputation, Journal Impact Factor, Science Citation Index, etc.) are crucial when Chinese ECRs read and publish; (b) assessment policy plays a vital role when Chinese ECRs decide where to publish; (c) open access and open data have been widely recognized and warmly welcomed by Chinese ECRs, however, they will only publish in open access journals and open their research data if they get rewarded by the evaluation system; (d) most Chinese ECRs had good experience of peer review and they are in favor of double blind peer review; (e) Chinese ECRs are heavy users of social media, they are sophisticated in finding scholarly information online and communicating with peers and colleagues with social media tools.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 70
页数:22
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Chinese researchers, scholarly communication behaviour and trust
    Nicholas, David
    Xu, Jie
    Xu, Lifang
    Su, Jing
    Watkinson, Anthony
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2016, 29 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [2] Scholarly communication and matters of trust and authority: A comparative analysis of Malaysian and Chinese researchers
    Abrizah, A.
    Xu, Jie
    Nicholas, David
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (03) : 69 - 91
  • [3] Social worlds of knowledge-work: How researchers appropriate digital libraries for scholarly communication
    Covi, L
    DIGITAL REVOLUTION - ASIS MID-YEAR 1996, 1996, : 84 - 100
  • [4] Open science from the standpoint of the new wave of researchers: Views from the scholarly frontline
    Nicholas D.
    Boukacem-Zeghmouri C.
    Abrizah A.
    Rodríguez-Bravo B.
    Xu J.
    Świgoń M.
    Watkinson A.
    Herman E.
    Information Services and Use, 2020, 39 (04): : 369 - 374
  • [5] Does the scholarly communication system satisfy the beliefs and aspirations of new researchers? Summarizing the Harbingers research
    Nicholas, David
    Watkinson, Anthony
    Abrizah, Abdullah
    Rodriguez-Bravo, Blanca
    Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa
    Xu, Jie
    Swigon, Marzena
    Herman, Eti
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2020, 33 (02) : 132 - 141
  • [6] The Twitter Conference as a New Medium of Scholarly Communication (and How to Host One)
    Bandula-Irwin, Tanya
    Kitchen, Veronica
    PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2022, 55 (04) : 778 - 782
  • [7] New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication is Shaping Social Cohesion
    Goggin, Gerard
    PROMETHEUS, 2008, 26 (04) : 402 - 404
  • [8] Chinese Early-Career Researchers' Scholarly Communication Attitudes and Behaviours: Changes Observed in Year Two of a Longitudinal Study
    Xu, Jie
    Nicholas, David
    Zeng, Yuanxiang
    Su, Jing
    Watkinson, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 2018, 49 (03) : 320 - 344
  • [9] A new series on how communication and communities are shaping us - Nice to meet you
    Schoenberger, Chana R.
    FORBES, 2007, 179 (09): : 66 - 67
  • [10] Sewing Up a Storm: How Robots and Other New Technologies are Shaping a New Era of Manufacturing
    Le, Kilara
    AATCC REVIEW, 2018, 18 (01) : 51 - 56