Indications, advantages and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical practice

被引:34
|
作者
Arthurs, Owen J. [1 ,2 ]
Taylor, Andrew M. [3 ,4 ]
Sebire, Neil J. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London WC1N 3JH, England
[2] UCL, Inst Child Hlth, London, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, Cardioresp Div, London WC1N 3JH, England
[4] UCL Inst Cardiovascular Sci, Ctr Cardiovasc Imaging, London, England
[5] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Histopathol, London WC1N 3JH, England
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Autopsy; Pathology; Foetus; Child; ORGAN WEIGHT ESTIMATION; INFANT-DEATH-SYNDROME; CONVENTIONAL AUTOPSY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; UNEXPECTED DEATH; FETAL; RADIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; FETUSES; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-014-3165-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Just as there is a range of paediatric imaging techniques available during life, a similar repertoire is available as part of the foetal and perinatal postmortem examination. In this article, we review the literature regarding the diagnostic utility of postmortem radiography, US, CT and MRI in this clinical setting. There is limited direct evidence on the diagnostic utility of any of these techniques, apart from postmortem MRI, which when combined with other noninvasive investigations, has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific for many foetal postmortem diagnoses. The main disadvantages of postmortem MRI include the longer duration of imaging, the need for appropriate training in the interpretation of normal postmortem changes, and possible non-diagnostic imaging examinations in early gestation foetuses. As less-invasive autopsy becomes increasingly available, the true utility of these techniques will evolve, and clinical guidelines for maximal diagnostic yield can be developed.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 500
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indications, advantages and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical practice
    Owen J. Arthurs
    Andrew M. Taylor
    Neil J. Sebire
    Pediatric Radiology, 2015, 45 : 491 - 500
  • [2] Xenon CT: Indications, limitations and advantages
    Piovan, E
    Pizzini, F
    Allesandrini, R
    Zampieri, P
    Beltramello, A
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 1999, 12 (02): : 237 - 246
  • [3] Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice
    Alderliesten, ME
    Peringa, J
    van der Hulst, VPM
    Blaauwgeers, HLG
    van Lith, JMM
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 110 (04) : 378 - 382
  • [4] Less invasive autopsy: Benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem
    Cohen, Marta C.
    Paley, Martyn N.
    Griffiths, Paul D.
    Whitby, Elspeth H.
    PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 11 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [5] ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS AND INDICATIONS FOR EPIDUROGRAPHY BY DIRECT CATHETERIZATION
    LAVIEILL.J
    CHEVROT, L
    ROUX, G
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE D ELECTROLOGIE ET DE MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE, 1968, 49 (6-7): : 512 - &
  • [6] ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGING
    KOSTER, WG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1985, 58 (692): : 813 - 813
  • [7] The future of pediatric and perinatal postmortem imaging
    Guillaume Gorincour
    Laure Sarda-Quarello
    Pierre-Eloi Laurent
    Alison Brough
    Guy N. Rutty
    Pediatric Radiology, 2015, 45 : 509 - 516
  • [8] The future of pediatric and perinatal postmortem imaging
    Gorincour, Guillaume
    Sarda-Quarello, Laure
    Laurent, Pierre-Eloi
    Brough, Alison
    Rutty, Guy N.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 45 (04) : 509 - 516
  • [9] DECOLONIZATION OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS CARRIERS: INDICATIONS, ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS
    de Oliveira, Adriana Cristina
    de Paula, Adriana Oliveira
    TEXTO & CONTEXTO ENFERMAGEM, 2012, 21 (02) : 448 - 457
  • [10] Indications and limitations of the use of subjective global assessment in clinical practice: an update
    Barbosa-Silva, M. Cristina G.
    Barros, Alufsio J. D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CLINICAL NUTRITION AND METABOLIC CARE, 2006, 9 (03): : 263 - 269