Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning

被引:112
作者
Bao, Lei [1 ]
Redish, Edward F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Phys, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Phys, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH | 2006年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010103
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Decades of education research have shown that students can simultaneously possess alternate knowledge frameworks and that the development and use of such knowledge are context dependent. As a result of extensive qualitative research, standardized multiple-choice tests such as Force Concept Inventory and Force-Motion Concept Evaluation tests provide instructors tools to probe their students' conceptual knowledge of physics. However, many existing quantitative analysis methods often focus on a binary question of whether a student answers a question correctly or not. This greatly limits the capacity of using the standardized multiple-choice tests in assessing students' alternative knowledge. In addition, the context dependence issue, which suggests that a student may apply the correct knowledge in some situations and revert to use alternative types of knowledge in others, is often treated as random noise in current analyses. In this paper, we present a model analysis, which applies qualitative research to establish a quantitative representation framework. With this method, students' alternative knowledge and the probabilities for students to use such knowledge in a range of equivalent contexts can be quantitatively assessed. This provides a way to analyze research-based multiple choice questions, which can generate much richer information than what is available from score-based analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Anderson J.R., 1998, ATOMIC COMPONENTS TH
[2]  
Baddeley A.D., 1997, Human memory: Theory and practice
[3]   Model analysis of fine structures of student models: An example with Newton's third law [J].
Bao, L ;
Hogg, K ;
Zollman, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2002, 70 (07) :766-778
[4]   Concentration analysis: A quantitative assessment of student states [J].
Bao, L ;
Redish, EF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2001, 69 (07) :S45-S53
[5]  
BAO L, UNPUB
[6]  
Bransford J. D., 1999, PEOPLE LEARN BRAIN M
[7]   NAIVE BELIEFS IN SOPHISTICATED SUBJECTS - MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT TRAJECTORIES OF OBJECTS [J].
CARAMAZZA, A ;
MCCLOSKEY, M ;
GREEN, B .
COGNITION, 1981, 9 (02) :117-123
[8]   FACTORS INFLUENCING THE LEARNING OF CLASSICAL MECHANICS [J].
CHAMPAGNE, AB ;
KLOPFER, LE ;
ANDERSON, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1980, 48 (12) :1074-1079
[9]  
Churchland P. S., 1993, The Computational Brain
[10]   STUDENTS PRECONCEPTIONS IN INTRODUCTORY MECHANICS [J].
CLEMENT, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1982, 50 (01) :66-71