Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus

被引:8
|
作者
Martinek, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Maluskova, Jana [3 ]
Stefanova, Magdalena [4 ]
Tuckova, Inna [5 ]
Suchanek, Stepan [6 ]
Vackova, Zuzana [1 ]
Krajciova, Jana [1 ]
Kollar, Marek [3 ]
Zavoral, Miroslav [6 ]
Spicak, Julius [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Dept Hepatogastroenterol, Prague 14021, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Ostrava, Fac Med, CZ-70103 Ostrava, Czech Republic
[3] IKEM, Dept Pathol, Prague 14021, Czech Republic
[4] Hosp Na Frantisku, Dept Internal Med, Prague 11000, Czech Republic
[5] Cent Mil Hosp, Dept Pathol, Prague 16902, Czech Republic
[6] Charles Univ Prague, Mil Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Prague 16902, Czech Republic
关键词
Barrett's esophagus; Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia; Biopsy forceps; Jumbo forceps; Specimen adequacy; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; LARGE-CAPACITY; SURVEILLANCE; STANDARD; ENDOSCOPY; PROTOCOL; ADENOCARCINOMAS; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; SAFETY;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5328
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To assess the sampling quality of four different forceps (three large capacity and one jumbo) in patients with Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-blind study. A total of 37 patients with Barrett's esophagus were enrolled. Targeted or random biopsies with all four forceps were obtained from each patient using a diagnostic endoscope during a single endoscopy. The following forceps were tested: A: FB-220K disposable large capacity; B: BI01-D3-23 reusable large capacity; C: GBF-02-23-180 disposable large capacity; and jumbo: disposable Radial Jaw 4 jumbo. The primary outcome measurement was specimen adequacy, defined as a well-oriented biopsy sample 2 mm or greater with the presence of muscularis mucosa. RESULTS: A total of 436 biopsy samples were analyzed. We found a significantly higher proportion of adequate biopsy samples with jumbo forceps (71%) (p < 0.001 vs forceps A: 26%, forceps B: 17%, and forceps C: 18%). Biopsies with jumbo forceps had the largest diameter (median 2.4 mm) (p < 0.001 vs forceps A: 2 mm, forceps B: 1.6 mm, and forceps C: 2mm). There was a trend for higher diagnostic yield per biopsy with jumbo forceps (forceps A: 0.20, forceps B: 0.22, forceps C: 0.27, and jumbo: 0.28). No complications related to specimen sampling were observed with any of the four tested forceps. CONCLUSION: Jumbo biopsy forceps, when used with a diagnostic endoscope, provide more adequate specimens as compared to large-capacity forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
引用
收藏
页码:5328 / 5335
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus
    Jan Martinek
    Jana Maluskova
    Magdalena Stefanova
    Inna Tuckova
    Stepan Suchanek
    Zuzana Vackova
    Jana Krajciova
    Marek Kollar
    Miroslav Zavoral
    Julius Spicak
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, 21 (17) : 5328 - 5335
  • [2] Maximum capacity ("jumbo") biopsy forceps versus large capacity biopsy forceps for endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus
    Chen, YK
    Thompson, KS
    Foliente, RL
    Kovacs, BJ
    Griffin, R
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (04) : AB65 - AB65
  • [3] Adequacy of Specimens of Esophageal Neo-Squamous Mucosa Using Jumbo Biopsy Forceps After Radiofrequency Ablation of Neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus
    Jani, Bhairvi
    Lim, Diego
    Kanakadandi, Vijay
    Vennalaganti, Prashanth
    Gupta, Neil
    Saligram, Shreyas
    Yandrapu, Harathi
    Mathur, Sharad C.
    Repici, Alessandro
    Sharma, Prateek
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB499 - AB500
  • [4] Jumbo Biopsy Forceps Improves Adequate Tissue Sampling in Patients With Barrett Esophagus: Randomized Comparison of 4 Different Biopsy Forceps
    Martinek, Jan
    Vackova, Zuzana
    Tuckova, Inna
    Stefanova, Magdalena
    Strosova, Alice
    Spicak, Julius
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 144 (05) : S694 - S694
  • [5] Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus Post Ablation: Is It Better to Use Jumbo Over Standard Biopsy Forceps?
    Vennelaganti, Sreekar
    Vennalaganti, Prashanth
    Duvvuri, Abhiram
    Lim, Diego
    Jani, Bhairvi
    Repici, Alessandro
    Ciscato, Camilla
    Spaggiari, Paola
    Consolo, Pierluigi
    Di Leo, Milena
    Mathur, Sharad
    Porter, Jaime
    Ferrara, Elisa
    Kennedy, Kevin
    Gupta, Neil
    Sharma, Prateek
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S258 - S259
  • [6] Jumbo biopsy forceps protocol still misses unsuspected cancer in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia
    Falk, GW
    Rice, TW
    Goldblum, JR
    Richter, JE
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (02) : 170 - 176
  • [7] Seattle biopsy protocol with jumbo biopsy forceps still misses unsuspected cancers in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia
    Falk, GW
    Rice, TW
    Goldblum, JR
    Richter, JE
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (04) : 174 - 174
  • [8] Efficacy of a new jumbo biopsy forcep on histopathology in Barrett's esophagus
    Swanson, Garth
    Brown, Michael
    Jakate, Shriram
    Komanduri, Srinadh
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB134 - AB134
  • [9] Use of a new jumbo forceps improves tissue acquisition of Barrett's esophagus surveillance biopsies
    Komanduri, Sri
    Swanson, Garth
    Keefer, Laurie
    Jakate, Shriram
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (06) : 1072 - 1078
  • [10] Surveillance of neo-squamous epithelium after ablation of Barrett's esophagus: is it better to use jumbo over standard biopsy forceps?
    Duvvuri, Abhiram
    Desai, Madhav
    Srinivasan, Sachin
    Chandrashekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Vennelaganti, Sreekar
    Vennalaganti, Prashanth
    Jani, Bhairvi
    Lim, Diego
    Ciscato, Camilla
    Spaggiari, Paola
    Consolo, Pierluigi
    Porter, Jaime
    Ferrara, Elisa
    Kennedy, Kevin
    Gupta, Neil
    Mathur, Sharad
    Sharma, Prateek
    Repici, Alessandro
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2020, 33 (07)