共 50 条
Socioeconomic Equity in the Receipt of In-Hospital Care and Outcomes in Australian Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: The CONCORDANCE Registry
被引:9
|作者:
Hyun, Karice
[1
,2
,3
]
Redfern, Julie
[2
]
Woodward, Mark
[2
,4
]
D'Souza, Mario
[5
]
Shetty, Pratap
[6
]
Chew, Derek
[7
]
Kangaharan, Nadarajah
[8
]
Farshid, Ahmad
[9
]
Alford, Kevin
[10
]
Briffa, Tom
[11
]
Brieger, David
[12
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Concord Hosp, ANZAC Res Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Oxford, George Inst Global Hlth, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Oxford, England
[5] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Sydney Local Hlth Dist Clin Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Wollongong Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[7] Flinders Univ S Australia, Dept Cardiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[8] Alice Springs Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Alice Springs, NT, Australia
[9] Canberra Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[10] Port Macquarie Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
[11] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Perth, WA, Australia
[12] Univ Sydney, Concord Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源:
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
Acute coronary syndrome;
Socioeconomic status;
In-Hospital care;
Clinical events;
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION;
HEALTH-CARE;
COVERAGE;
SERVICE;
DISEASE;
MORTALITY;
ACCESS;
SYSTEM;
D O I:
10.1016/j.hlc.2017.08.019
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background Socioeconomic status (SES) is a social determinant of both health and receipt of health care services, but its impact is under-studied in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to examine the influence of SES on in-hospital care, and clinical events for patients presenting with an ACS to public hospitals in Australia. Methods Data from 9064 ACS patient records were collected from 41 public hospitals nationwide from 2009 as part of the Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome Care (CONCORDANCE) registry. For this analysis, we divided the cohort into four socioeconomic groups (based on postcode of usual residence) and compared the in-hospital care provided and clinical outcomes before and after adjustment for both patient clinical characteristics and hospital clustering. Results Patients were divided into four SES groups (from the most to the least disadvantaged: 2042 (23%) vs. 2104 (23%) vs. 1994 (22%) vs. 2968 (32%)). Following adjustments for patient characteristics, there were no differences in the odds of receiving coronary angiogram, revascularisation, prescription of recommended medication, or referral to cardiac rehabilitation across the SES groups (p = 0.06, 0.69, 0.89 and 0.79, respectively). After adjustment for clinical characteristics, no associations were observed for in-hospital and cumulative death (p = 0.62 and p = 0.71, respectively). However, the most disadvantaged group were 37% more likely to have a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) than the least disadvantaged group (OR (95% CI): 137 (1.1, 1.71), p = 0.02) driven by incidence of in-hospital heart failure. Conclusions Although there may be gaps in the delivery of care, this delivery of care does not differ by patient's SES. It is an encouraging affirmation that all patients in Australian public hospitals receive equal in-hospital care, and the likelihood of death is comparable between the SES groups.
引用
收藏
页码:1398 / 1405
页数:8
相关论文