Optimal strategies for product price, customer environmental volunteering, and corporate environmental responsibility

被引:18
|
作者
Peng, Wei [1 ,3 ]
Xin, Baogui [1 ,3 ]
Xie, Lei [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Sch Management, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Econ & Management, 579 Qianwangang Rd, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Univ, Sch Management, 27 Shanda South Rd, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
关键词
Corporate reputation; Corporate environmental responsibility; Customer environmental volunteering; Green marketing; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; REPUTATION; REDUCTION; POLICY; BEHAVIORS; BUSINESS; DESIGN; LEVEL; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132635
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A green marketing strategy must emphasise at least three aspects: environmentally friendly products that satisfy customer needs, consumers' perceptions of a firm's commitment to products and the environment, and competitive product prices (Menon and Menon, 1997). First, we propose a dynamic programming model to develop the aforementioned strategy for a trade-off among product price, customer environmental volunteering (CEV), and corporate environmental responsibility (CER). Second, we solve the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equations to obtain optimal strategies in scenarios with and without government subsidies. Third, we implement a case study on The Walt Disney Company to verify these optimal strategies. Last, we conduct parameter sensitivity analyses using numerical simulations to draw some practical implications. The results suggest that: (i) government subsidies can effectively enhance a firm's CER and CEV investments, corporate reputations, product prices, and profits, which will encourage the firm to contribute more to its environmental initiatives; (ii) regardless of the height of the initial corporate reputation level, a firm should not engage in myopic thinking and ignore continuous corporate reputation management, which will damage its reputation and profits; and (iii) corporate reputation management should be a firm's long-term strategy with continuous investments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal Strategies of Product Price, Quality, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility
    Peng, Wei
    Xin, Baogui
    Kwon, Yekyung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (23)
  • [2] The impact of product market competition on corporate environmental responsibility
    X. H. Meng
    S. X. Zeng
    X. M. Xie
    G. Y. Qi
    Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2016, 33 : 267 - 291
  • [3] The impact of product market competition on corporate environmental responsibility
    Meng, X. H.
    Zeng, S. X.
    Xie, X. M.
    Qi, G. Y.
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 33 (01) : 267 - 291
  • [4] Corporate environmental responsibility
    DesJardins, J
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1998, 17 (08) : 825 - 838
  • [5] Corporate Environmental Responsibility
    Joe DesJardins
    Journal of Business Ethics, 1998, 17 : 825 - 838
  • [6] Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Customer Loyalty
    Yan Jingdong
    Luo Shanshan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS I & II, 2017, : 825 - 829
  • [7] Major government customer and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from China
    Yu, Xiaojun
    Li, Qiang
    Zhang, Lin
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 183
  • [8] Corporate governance and environmental responsibility
    Tan, Siow-Hooi
    Habibullah, Muzafar Shah
    Tan, Siow-Kian
    ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2017, 63 : 213 - 215
  • [9] Corporate environmental responsibility and criminology
    Bisschop, Lieselot
    CRIME LAW AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2010, 53 (04) : 349 - 364
  • [10] The Economics of Corporate Environmental Responsibility
    Crifo, Patricia
    Sinclair-Desgagne, Bernard
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 7 (3-4): : 279 - 297