Does Nursing Behaviour of Sows in Loose-Housing Pens Differ from That of Sows in Farrowing Pens with Crates?

被引:1
|
作者
Wiechers, Dierck-Hinrich [1 ]
Herbrandt, Swetlana [2 ]
Kemper, Nicole [1 ]
Fels, Michaela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vet Med Hannover, Inst Anim Hyg Anim Welf & Farm Anim Behav, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D-30173 Hannover, Germany
[2] TU Dortmund Univ, Stat Consulting & Anal Ctr Higher Educ, Vogelpothsweg 87, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany
来源
ANIMALS | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
suckling; nursing; loose-housing; sow behaviour; maternal behaviour; free-farrowing; MATERNAL-BEHAVIOR; SUCKLING BEHAVIOR; WEIGHT-GAIN; MILK EJECTION; DOMESTIC PIG; LACTATION; PIGLETS; ENVIRONMENT; SYSTEMS; WELFARE;
D O I
10.3390/ani12020137
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Around birth and during lactation, sows are often confined to narrow farrowing crates in order to restrict their movements to prevent piglet crushing by sows. Since these housing systems are increasingly questioned for sow welfare reasons, more research is being carried out on alternatives such as loose-housing farrowing systems. As one central aspect of sows' maternal behaviour, nursing behaviour impacts the mortality rate and growth performance of the piglets. Since maternal behaviour is, in turn, affected by the housing environment, this study aimed to compare a farrowing pen without sow confinement to one with a crate regarding the nursing behaviour of sows. The study results underline that sows' nursing behaviour was influenced by the housing system and, furthermore, that the nursing behaviour of loose-housed sows was more similar to that of sows in semi-natural conditions. Unconfined sows terminated more nursing bouts and nursed piglets for a shorter period. The nursing frequency decreased in the course of lactation in both systems, whereas the proportion of sow-terminated nursing bouts increased in the four-week examination period. These might be the first steps in the natural weaning of piglets. Sows confined to farrowing crates are restricted in performing natural behaviour such as maternal behaviour. Loose-housing farrowing pens (LH) and farrowing pens with crates (FC) were compared regarding sows' nursing behaviour via video analyses over four weeks per batch (one day per week). Nursing frequency was similar in LH and FC pens (1.25 +/- 0.82 vs. 1.19 +/- 0.75 nursings/sow/hour; p > 0.05). However, nursing duration differed between the two systems (LH: 5.7 +/- 4.6 min vs. FC: 7.0 +/- 5.0 min; odds ratio (OR) 1.168, p = 0.011). In LH pens, more nursing bouts were sow-terminated than in FC pens (OR 0.427, p = 0.001). The probability of sow-terminated nursing occurring increased from week 1 to week 4 (OR 3.479, adjusted p (p(adj)) < 0.001), while that of observing unnursed piglets decreased from week 1 to week 4 (OR 0.301, p(adj) < 0.001) and rose with increasing litter size (OR 1.174, p = 0.010). We conclude that nursing behaviour was affected by the farrowing system, with shorter nursing duration and more nursing terminations by the sow in LH than in FC pens. Since this corresponds to the nursing behaviour of sows in semi-natural conditions, it can be assumed that sows in LH pens are more likely to exhibit natural nursing behaviour.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Peripartal behaviour and teat lesions of sows in farrowing crates and in a loose-housing system
    Verhovsek, D.
    Troxler, J.
    Baumgartner, J.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 273 - 276
  • [2] The behaviour and welfare of sows and piglets in farrowing crates or lactation pens
    Singh, C.
    Verdon, M.
    Cronin, G. M.
    Hemsworth, P. H.
    ANIMAL, 2017, 11 (07) : 1210 - 1221
  • [3] Duration of farrowing is longer in sows housed in farrowing crates than in pens
    Oliviero, C.
    Heinonen, M.
    Valros, A.
    Halli, O.
    Peltoniemi, O. A. T.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2006, 41 (04) : 367 - 367
  • [4] Segmentation of sows in farrowing pens
    Tu, Gang Jun
    Karstoft, Henrik
    Pedersen, Lene Juul
    Jorgensen, Erik
    IET IMAGE PROCESSING, 2014, 8 (01) : 56 - 68
  • [5] PRODUCTIVITY AND BEHAVIOR OF SOWS IN LEVEL VS SLOPED FARROWING PENS AND CRATES
    MCGLONE, JJ
    MORROWTESCH, J
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1990, 68 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [6] SUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF SOWS IN FARROWING CRATES AND STRAW-BEDDED PENS
    CRONIN, GM
    SMITH, JA
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1992, 33 (2-3) : 175 - 189
  • [7] Floor heating at farrowing in pens for loose-housed sows
    Brandt, P.
    Moustsen, V. A.
    Nielsen, M. B. F.
    Kristensen, A. R.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2012, 143 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [8] A comparison of the behaviour and performance of sows and piglets in crates and oval pens
    Bradshaw, RH
    Broom, DM
    ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1999, 69 : 327 - 333
  • [9] Predicting farrowing of sows housed in crates and pens using accelerometers and CUSUM charts
    Pastell, Matti
    Flietaoja, Juha
    Yun, Jinhyeon
    Tiusanen, Johannes
    Valros, Anna
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2016, 127 : 197 - 203
  • [10] Observations of sows and piglets housed in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial farm
    Chidgey, Kirsty L.
    Morel, Patrick C. H.
    Stafford, Kevin J.
    Barugh, Ian W.
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2016, 176 : 12 - 18