Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: the Trade-Offs of Sustainability Ratings

被引:271
作者
Delmas, Magali [1 ]
Blass, Vered Doctori [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
environmental performance; socially responsible investing; Toxic Release Inventory; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; CERTIFICATION; STANDARDS; ISO-14001; ISO-9000;
D O I
10.1002/bse.676
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Socially responsible investing (SRI) represents an investment process that reflects environmental and social preferences. The financial industry is in a unique position to move corporations towards corporate sustainability. However, there is often little transparency regarding the metrics used to evaluate corporate social and environmental performance and the trade-offs involved in the evaluation. In this paper we discuss the various trade-offs of sustainability screening methodologies. We show that the rating of companies varies significantly according to whether the screening is based on toxic releases and regulatory compliance or on the quality of environmental policy and disclosure. We base our analysis on the evaluation of the performance of 15 firms in the chemical sector. The analysis indicates that firms that have the most advanced reporting and environmental management practices tend also to have higher levels of toxic releases and lower environmental compliance. We provide methodological recommendations to help stakeholders evaluate corporate environmental performance. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 260
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], REP SOC RESP INV TRE
[2]  
Belkaoui A., 1989, Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, V2, P36, DOI [10.1108/09513578910132240, DOI 10.1108/09513578910132240]
[3]   Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies [J].
Brammer, Stephen ;
Pavelin, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2006, 33 (7-8) :1168-1188
[4]   Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating non-financial performance measurement [J].
Chatterji, A ;
Levine, D .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2006, 48 (02) :29-+
[5]   How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility? [J].
Chatterji, Aaron K. ;
Levine, David I. ;
Toffel, Michael W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2009, 18 (01) :125-169
[6]  
CHATTERJI AK, 2008, U CALIFORNIA BERKELE
[7]  
CHEN CM, 2009, ECO VS PRODUCTIVE EF
[8]  
CHEN CM, 2009, MEASURING CORPORATE
[9]   Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets [J].
Christmann, P .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :663-680
[10]  
Delmas M.A., 2008, SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE