Benefit cost comparisons between state and local governments and private sector employers

被引:1
|
作者
McDonnell, Kenneth J.
Salisbury, Dallas
机构
[1] EBRI, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Employee Benefit Res Inst, Portland, OR 97214 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/009102600503400404
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In June of 2005, overall total compensation costs were 46 percent higher among state and local government employers ($35.46 per hour worked) than among private-sector employers ($24.24 per hour worked) (calculated from Figure 1). Total compensation costs consist of two major categories: wages and salaries and employee benefits. For both of these categories, state and local government employers' costs were higher than those of private-sector employers: 40 percent higher for wages and salaries and 61 percent higher for employee benefits (calculated from Figure 3). This article examines some of the causes of the differences in total compensation costs between state and local government employers and private-sector employers. The datasets used are as follows: For compensation costs, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Employer Costs for Employee Compensation: June 2005; for private-sector benefit participation, the BLS's National Compensation Survey, Employee Benefits in Private Industry in the United States, March 2005; and for state and local government employers, BLS' Employee Benefits in State and Local Governments, 1998. Employment by industry group data come from BLS' Employment and Earnings, August 2005, and employment by occupation data are from EBRI tabulations of the Current Population Survey, March 2005 Supplement by the U. S. Census Bureau.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 327
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The provision of infrastructure: benefit–cost criteria for optimizing local governments
    T. Daniel Woodbury
    International Tax and Public Finance, 2020, 27 : 552 - 574
  • [2] SOME COMPARISONS BETWEEN PUBLIC SECTOR AND PRIVATE SECTOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
    IMUNDO, LV
    LABOR LAW JOURNAL, 1973, 24 (12) : 810 - 817
  • [3] The provision of infrastructure: benefit-cost criteria for optimizing local governments
    Woodbury, T. Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2020, 27 (03) : 552 - 574
  • [4] Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector
    Bresciani, C
    Perez, RO
    Habr-Gama, A
    Yacob, CE
    Ozaki, A
    Batagello, C
    Proscurshim, I
    Gama-Rodrigues, J
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2005, 9 (08) : 1174 - 1180
  • [5] Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector
    Cláudio Bresciani
    Rodrigo Oliva Perez
    Angelita Habr-Gama
    Carlos Eduardo Jacob
    Alberto Ozaki
    Carlos Batagello
    Igor Proscurshim
    Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2005, 9 : 1174 - 1181
  • [6] REVENUE SHARING BETWEEN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
    QUINDRY, KE
    SOULE, DM
    GROWTH AND CHANGE, 1970, 1 (03) : 8 - 13
  • [7] INFORMATION SHARING BETWEEN LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS
    Akbulut-Bailey, Asli Yagmur
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 51 (04) : 53 - 63
  • [8] Public Private Partnership between Local Governments and Nonprofits in Japan
    Okuyama, Naoko
    Ishida, Yu
    Yamauchi, Naoto
    NONPROFIT POLICY FORUM, 2010, 1 (01)
  • [9] STATE AND LOCAL-GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY AND PRIVATE SECTOR
    FOSLER, RS
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1978, 38 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [10] Trends in Public-Private Pay Parity in State and Local Governments
    Lewis, Gregory B.
    Pathak, Rahul
    Galloway, Chester S.
    REVIEW OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 38 (03) : 303 - 331