The Effects of Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:26
|
作者
Ojo, Omorogieva [1 ]
Ojo, Osarhumwese Osaretin [2 ]
Feng, Qianqian [3 ]
Boateng, Joshua [4 ]
Wang, Xiaohua [3 ]
Brooke, Joanne [5 ]
Adegboye, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greenwich, Sch Hlth Sci Hlth & Human Sci, Fac Educ, Avery Hill Campus,Avery Hill Rd, London SE9 2UG, England
[2] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, Univ Hosp, Smoking Cessat Dept, Lewisham High St, London SE13 6LH, England
[3] Soochow Univ, Sch Nursing, Suzhou 215006, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Greenwich, Sch Sci, Medway Campus,Cent Ave, Chatham ME4 4TB, Kent, England
[5] Birmingham City Univ, Fac Hlth Educ & Life Sci, Ravensbury House,City South Campus, Birmingham B15 3TN, W Midlands, England
[6] Coventry Univ, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Ctr Healthcare Res, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
关键词
COVID-19; enteral nutrition; early enteral nutrition; delayed enteral nutrition; parenteral nutrition; gastrointestinal intolerance; mortality; length of hospital stay; days on mechanical ventilation;
D O I
10.3390/nu14051120
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Patients who are critically ill with COVID-19 could have impaired nutrient absorption due to disruption of the normal intestinal mucosa. They are often in a state of high inflammation, increased stress and catabolism as well as a significant increase in energy and protein requirements. Therefore, timely enteral nutrition support and the provision of optimal nutrients are essential in preventing malnutrition in these patients. Aim: This review aims to evaluate the effects of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Method: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-Analysis framework and PICO. Searches were conducted in databases, including EMBASE, Health Research databases and Google Scholar. Searches were conducted from database inception until 3 February 2022. The reference lists of articles were also searched for relevant articles. Results: Seven articles were included in the systematic review, and four articles were included in the meta-analysis. Two distinct areas were identified from the results of the systematic review and meta-analysis: the impact of enteral nutrition and gastrointestinal intolerance associated with enteral nutrition. The impact of enteral nutrition was further sub-divided into early enteral nutrition versus delayed enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition. The results of the meta-analysis of the effects of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with COVID-19 showed that, overall, enteral nutrition was effective in significantly reducing the risk of mortality in these patients compared with the control with a risk ratio of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79, 0.99, p = 0.04). Following sub-group analysis, the early enteral nutrition group also showed a significant reduction in the risk of mortality with a risk ratio of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79, 1.00, p = 0.05). The Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) of mortality in patients with COVID-19 by early enteral nutrition was 11%. There was a significant reduction in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the early enteral nutrition group compared with the delayed enteral nutrition group. There was no significant difference between enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition in relation to mortality (RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59, 1.28, p = 0.48). Concerning the length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay and days on mechanical ventilation, while there were reductions in the number of days in the enteral nutrition group compared to the control (delayed enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition), the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The results showed that early enteral nutrition significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the risk of mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19. However, early enteral nutrition or enteral nutrition did not significantly (p > 0.05) reduce the length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay and days on mechanical ventilation compared to delayed enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition. More studies are needed to examine the effect of early enteral nutrition in patients with COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients with Enteral Nutrition: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Xu, Jing
    Shi, Wenyu
    Xie, Liying
    Xu, Jing
    Bian, Lanzheng
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 10 (01): : 7 - 15
  • [2] Mortality and morbidity in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gebremeskel, Gebreamlak Gebremedhn
    Tadesse, Degena Bahrey
    Haile, Teklehaimanot Gereziher
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 17 (10)
  • [3] Glycemic Control in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chander, Subhash
    Deepak, Vishal
    Kumari, Roopa
    Leys, Lorenzo
    Wang, Hong Yu
    Mehta, Puja
    Sadarat, F. N. U.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [4] The effect of enteral versus parenteral nutrition for critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Gensheng
    Zhang, Kai
    Cui, Wei
    Hong, Yucai
    Zhang, Zhongheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2018, 51 : 62 - 92
  • [5] Effect of combined parenteral and enteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition alone for critically ill patients A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Jialing
    Wei, Liying
    Huang, Rongzhi
    Liao, Liang
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (41)
  • [6] Early parenteral nutrition alone or accompanying enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wan, Xiao
    Gao, Xuejin
    Tian, Feng
    Wu, Chao
    Wang, Xinying
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2015, 24 (02) : 227 - 233
  • [7] Prevalence of Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mohamed, Mouhand F. H.
    Al-Shokri, Shaikha D.
    Shunnar, Khaled M.
    Mohamed, Sara F.
    Najim, Mostafa S.
    Ibrahim, Shahd I.
    Elewa, Hazem
    Abdalla, Lina O.
    El-Bardissy, Ahmed
    Elshafei, Mohamed Nabil
    Abubeker, Ibrahim Y.
    Danjuma, Mohammed
    Dousa, Khalid M.
    Yassin, Mohamed A.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 7
  • [8] Association of vasopressors with mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Maria Mermiri
    Georgios Mavrovounis
    Eleni Laou
    Nikolaos Papagiannakis
    Ioannis Pantazopoulos
    Athanasios Chalkias
    Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science, 1 (2):
  • [9] Tracheostomy outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
    Battaglini, Denise
    Premraj, Lavienraj
    White, Nicole
    Sutt, Anna-Liisa
    Robba, Chiara
    Cho, Sung -Min
    Di Giacinto, Ida
    Bressan, Filippo
    Sorbello, Massimiliano
    Cuthbertson, Brian H.
    Li Bassi, Gianluigi
    Suen, Jacky
    Fraser, John F.
    Pelosi, Paolo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 129 (05) : 679 - 692
  • [10] Effectiveness and tolerance of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with COVID-19
    Perez-Cruz, Elizabeth
    Ortiz-Gutierrez, Salvador
    Castanon-Gonzalez, Jorge Alberto
    Luna-Camacho, Yuritzy
    Garduno-Lopez, Jessica
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2024,