Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Israel: Screening in different subpopulations

被引:0
|
作者
Schlesinger, Y
Reich, D
Eidelman, AI
Schimmel, MS
Hassanin, A
Miron, D
机构
[1] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Infect Dis Unit, IL-91031 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Neonatol, IL-91031 Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] HaEmek Med Ctr, Dept Neonatol, Afula, Israel
[5] HaEmek Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Afula, Israel
[6] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
来源
ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2005年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
cytomegalovirus; Israel; congenital infection; newborn; screening;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The incidence of congenital cytomegalovirus in Israel has never been determined, either in general or in relation to various population subgroups. We recently proved the utility of newborn urine polymerase chain reaction as a screening tool for congenital CMV. Objectives: To define the incidence of congenital CMV infection in two different subpopulations, as a model for the entire population of Israel. Methods: Urine specimens were randomly collected from 2,000 newborns in Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, and HaEmek Medical Center, Afula (1,000 specimens each). These hospitals have many characteristic differences, presumably representing the diverse population of Israel. Urine specimens were subjected to a CMV PCR reaction and positive specimens were validated by urine viral culture. Maternal seroprevalence was determined in a representative sample of the mothers in each hospital. Epidemiologic characteristics of the mothers were extracted from hospital records and compared. Results: The population in Shaare Zedek Medical Center was mostly Jewish (97.7%) and urban (87.0%), as compared to that of HaEmek Medical Center (49.2% and 61.0%, respectively, P < 0.01). Nevertheless, CMV seroprevalence was similar: 81.5% and 85%, respectively. Ten (1.0%) and 4 (0.4%) newborns, respectively, were found to have congenital CMV infection (not significant). Conclusions: The combined incidence of congenital CMV infection in the study population was 0.7% (95% confidence interval 0.3-1.0%). If this rate is extrapolated to the entire population of Israel, then a total of 945 cases of congenital CMV can be expected among the 135,000 annual deliveries. A nationwide screening program for congenital CMV should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 240
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Screening and Treatment
    Pass, Robert F.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2010, 157 (02): : 179 - 180
  • [3] Screening Newborns for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection
    Dollard, Sheila C.
    Schleiss, Mark R.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (04): : 407 - 408
  • [4] Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: is screening desirable?
    Foulon, W
    Gynaecology, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine in Daily Practice, 2005, 1279 : 115 - 117
  • [5] Screening Newborns for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection
    Bale, James F., Jr.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (14): : 1425 - 1426
  • [6] Congenital cytomegalovirus infection - a question of screening
    Rahav, Galia
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2007, 9 (05): : 392 - 394
  • [7] LYMPHOCYTE-T SUBPOPULATIONS IN CONGENITAL CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION
    PASS, RF
    ROPER, MA
    AUGUST, AM
    INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1983, 41 (03) : 1380 - 1382
  • [8] Universal newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection
    Schleiss, Mark R.
    Blazquez-Gamero, Daniel
    LANCET CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2025, 9 (01): : 57 - 70
  • [9] Evaluation of screening tests for congenital cytomegalovirus infection
    Inoue, Naoki
    Koyano, Shin
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2008, 27 (02) : 182 - 184
  • [10] Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in Iran
    Javid, Naeme
    Cheraghali, Fatemeh
    Moradi, Abdolvahab
    Kelishadi, Mishar
    Tabarraei, Alijan
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2016, 35 (09) : 1052 - 1052