Effective Shear Plane Model for Tearout and Block Shear Failure of Bolted Connections

被引:0
|
作者
Teh, Lip H. [1 ]
Deierlein, Gregory G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Civil Min & Environm Engn, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
block shear; bolted connections; gusset plates; shear-out; shear planes; tearout; RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN; STEEL; STRENGTH; CRITERIA; LOAD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In spite of many revisions to the block shear requirements of the AISC Specification, the model in the current Specification can result in calculated strengths and failure modes that are inconsistent with published test data. The inconsistencies are primarily related to the assumed interaction of tensile and shear resisting mechanisms, combined with the definition of net and gross shear planes that are unrealistic. Using recently published test results of single-bolt connections in mild and high-strength steel plates, the shear failure planes are observed to be neither the assumed net nor gross shear planes, which are the basis of the current design provision, but rather effective shear planes with a calculated area that is between the net and gross areas. Based on the tensile rupture and shear yielding mechanism, and assuming that the steel on the effective shear planes is fully strain hardened, a simpler and more accurate block shear design equation is proposed. The new equation is straightforward to implement as it requires a simple rearrangement of existing design variables to determine an effective shear failure area. Through verifications against 161 gusset plate specimens, tested by independent researchers around the world, the proposed equation is shown to be significantly more accurate than the current AISC, Canadian, European and Japanese block shear design provisions. A resistance factor of 0.85 is recommended for use with the proposed equation, based on the available statistics from tests and well-established LRFD reliability principles. An example is presented to illustrate the impact of the proposed design provision, which can result in significantly fewer bolts per connection and/or smaller gusset plates, leading to simpler and more economical designs.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 194
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Block shear failure of austenitic stainless steel bolted connections
    Song, Yuchen
    Lin, Xue-Mei
    Yam, Michael C. H.
    Ke, Ke
    THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2023, 193
  • [2] Active Shear Planes of Bolted Connections Failing in Block Shear
    Clements, Drew D. A.
    Teh, Lip H.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (03) : 320 - 327
  • [3] Block shear failure planes of bolted connections - Direct experimental verifications
    Teh, Lip H.
    Uz, Mehmet E.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2015, 111 : 70 - 74
  • [4] Simulation of block shear fracture in bolted connections
    Wen, Huajie
    Mahmoud, Hussam
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2017, 134 : 1 - 16
  • [5] Shear bearing of bolted connections with the beginning of the thread near the shear plane
    Friede, Roland
    Lange, Joerg
    Nicolay, Thorsten
    STAHLBAU, 2010, 79 (12) : 901 - +
  • [6] Tension plane behavior in single-row bolted connections subject to block shear
    Orbison, JG
    Wagner, ME
    Fritz, WP
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 1999, 49 (03) : 225 - 239
  • [7] Generalised component method for bolted bearing type connections incorporating block shear failure
    Zhou, Jingsheng
    Rasmussen, Kim J. R.
    Yan, Shen
    Deierlein, Gregory G.
    Zhang, Hao
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2024, 220
  • [8] AISC LRFD rules for block shear in bolted connections - A review
    1600, American Institute of Steel Construction Inc. (39):
  • [9] AISC LRFD rules for block shear in bolted connections - A review
    Gupta, Mohan
    Gupta, L.M.
    Engineering Journal, 1600, 39 (04):
  • [10] AISC LRFD rules for block shear in bolted connections - A review
    Kulak, GL
    Grondin, GY
    ENGINEERING JOURNAL-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION INC, 2001, 38 (04): : 199 - 203