Determination of the optical turbulence parameters from the adaptive optics telemetry: critical analysis and on-sky validation

被引:11
|
作者
Jolissaint, Laurent [1 ]
Ragland, Sam [2 ]
Christou, Julian [3 ]
Wizinowich, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Western Switzerland HEIG VD, 1 Route Cheseaux, CH-1401 Yverdon, Switzerland
[2] WM Keck Observ, 65-1120 Mamalahoa Hwy, Kamuela, HI 96743 USA
[3] Gemini Observ, 670 Aohoku Pl, Hilo, HI 96720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ATMOSPHERIC-TURBULENCE; OUTER SCALE; LOOP DATA; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; LONG;
D O I
10.1364/AO.57.007837
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
It has been demonstrated by several authors that the optical turbulence parameters associated with a given adaptive optics (AO) run-the seeing angle and outer scale-can be determined from a statistical analysis of the commands of the system's deformable mirror (DM). The higher the accuracy on these parameters, the more we can make use of them, allowing for instance a better estimation of the seeing statistics at the telescope location or a more accurate assessment of the performance of the AO system. In the context of a point spread function reconstruction project (PSF-R) for the W. M. Keck observatory AO system, we decided to identify, in the most exhaustive way, all the sources of systematic and random errors affecting the determination of the seeing angle and outer scale from the DM telemetry, and find ways to compensate/mitigate these errors to keep them under 10%. The seeing estimated using our improved DM-seeing method was compared with more than 70 nearly simultaneous seeing measurements from open-loop PSFs on the same optical axis, and with independent seeing-monitor measurements acquired at the same time but far from the telescope (DIMM/MASS): the correlation with the open-loop PSF is very good (the error is about 10%), validating the DM-seeing method for accurate seeing determination, while it is weak and sometimes completely uncorrelated with the DIMM/MASS seeing monitor data. We concluded that DM-based seeing can be very accurate if all the error terms are considered in the DM data processing, but that seeing taken from non-collocated seeing monitors is of no use even when moderate accuracy is required. (C) 2018 Optical Society of America
引用
收藏
页码:7837 / 7856
页数:20
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Integrated turbulence parameters' estimation from NAOMI adaptive optics telemetry data
    Morujao, Nuno
    Correia, Carlos
    Andrade, Paulo
    Woillez, Julien
    Garcia, Paulo
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2023, 678
  • [2] On-sky validation of image-based adaptive optics wavefront sensor referencing
    Skaf, Nour
    Guyon, Olivier
    Gendron, Eric
    Ahn, Kyohoon
    Bertrou-Cantou, Arielle
    Boccaletti, Anthony
    Cranney, Jesse
    Currie, Thayne
    Deo, Vincent
    Edwards, Billy
    Ferreira, Florian
    Gratadour, Damien
    Lozi, Julien
    Norris, Barnaby
    Sevin, Arnaud
    Vidal, Fabrice
    Vievard, Sebastien
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2022, 659
  • [3] On-sky performance and recent results from the Subaru coronagraphic extreme adaptive optics system
    Currie, Thayne M.
    Guyon, Olivier
    Lozi, Julien
    Sahoo, Ananya
    Vievard, Sebastien
    Deo, Vincent
    Chilcote, Jeffrey
    Groff, Tyler
    Brandt, Timothy
    Lawson, Kellen
    Skaf, Nour
    Martinache, Frantz
    Kasdin, N. Jeremy
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS VII, 2020, 11448
  • [4] The CHARA array adaptive optics I: common-path optical and mechanical design, and preliminary on-sky results
    Che, Xiao
    Sturmann, Laszlo
    Monnier, John D.
    ten Brummelaar, Theo A.
    Sturmann, Judit
    Ridgway, Stephen T.
    Ireland, Michael J.
    Turner, Nils H.
    McAlister, Harold A.
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS IV, 2014, 9148
  • [5] On-sky results from the wide-field ground-layer adaptive optics demonstrator 'imaka
    Chun, Mark
    Lu, Jessica
    Lai, Olivier
    Abdurrahman, Fatima
    Toomey, Douglas
    Fohring, Dora
    Baranec, Christoph
    Hayano, Yutaka
    Oya, Shin
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS VI, 2018, 10703
  • [6] Optimizing the accuracy and efficiency of optical turbulence profiling using adaptive optics telemetry for extremely large telescopes
    Laidlaw, Douglas J.
    Osborn, James
    Morris, Timothy J.
    Basden, Alastair G.
    Beltramo-Martin, Olivier
    Butterley, Timothy
    Gendron, Eric
    Reeves, Andrew P.
    Rousset, Gerard
    Townson, Matthew J.
    Wilson, Richard W.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 483 (04) : 4341 - 4353
  • [7] Adaptive optics point spread function reconstruction: lessons learned from on-sky experiment on Altair/Gemini and pathway for future systems
    Jolissaint, Laurent
    Christou, Julian
    Wizinowich, Peter
    Tolstoy, Eline
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS II, 2010, 7736
  • [8] Assessment of adaptive optics-corrected optical links statistics from integrated turbulence parameters through a Gaussian process metamodel
    Klotz, Emile
    Lefebvre, Sidonie
    Vedrenne, Nicolas
    Musso, Christian
    Poulenard, Sylvain
    Fusco, Thierry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2024, 42 (01) : 38 - 56
  • [9] DETERMINATION OF SOME PARAMETERS OF ATMOSPHERIC-TURBULENCE FROM OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS
    DROFA, AS
    IZVESTIYA AKADEMII NAUK SSSR FIZIKA ATMOSFERY I OKEANA, 1979, 15 (05): : 524 - 532
  • [10] Joint estimation of atmospheric and instrumental defects using a parsimonious point spread function model: On-sky validation using state of the art worldwide adaptive-optics assisted instruments
    Beltramo-Martin, Olivier
    Fétick, Romain
    Neichel, Benoit
    Fusco, Thierry
    Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2020, 643