Risk-adjusted analysis of long-term outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

被引:3
|
作者
Deutsch, Marcus-Andre [1 ]
Zittermann, Armin [1 ]
Renner, Andre [1 ]
Schramm, Rene [1 ]
Gotte, Julia [1 ]
Borgermann, Jochen [2 ]
Fox, Henrik [1 ]
Rojas, Sebastian, V [1 ]
Gyoten, Takayuki [1 ]
Morshuis, Michiel [1 ]
Koster, Andreas [3 ]
Hulde, Nikolai [3 ]
Hinse, Dennis [4 ]
Hakim-Meibodi, Kavous [1 ]
Gummert, Jan F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Univ Hosp, Herz & Diabeteszentrum NRW, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Georgstr 11, D-32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
[2] Heart Ctr Duisburg, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Duisburg, Germany
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Univ Hosp, Inst Anesthesiol & Pain Therapy, Herz & Diabeteszentrum NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
[4] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Univ Hosp, Inst Lab & Transfus Med, Herz & Diabeteszentrum NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
关键词
Coronary artery disease; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Myocardial revascularization; Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting; Off-pump surgery; ON-PUMP; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; REVASCULARIZATION; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivab179
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Recent data suggested that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may carry a higher risk for mortality in the long term when compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB). We, therefore, compared long-term survival and morbidity in patients undergoing ONCAB versus OPCAB in a large single-centre cohort. METHODS: A total of 8981 patients undergoing isolated elective/urgent coronary artery bypass grafting between January 2009 and December 2019 were analysed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (OPCAB n = 6649/ONCAB n = 2332). The primary end point was allcause mortality. Secondary endpoints included repeat revascularization, stroke and myocardial infarction. To adjust for potential selection bias, 1:1 nearest neighbour propensity score (PS) matching was performed resulting in 1857 matched pairs. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was applied in the entire study cohort using multivariable- and PS-adjusted Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: In the PS-matched cohort, 10-year mortality was similar between study groups [OPCAB 36.4% vs ONCAB 35.8%: hazard ratio (HR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.12; P = 0.84]. While 10-year outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly, risk of stroke (OPCAB 1.50% vs ONCAB 2.8%: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.83; P= 0.006) and mortality (OPCAB 3.1% vs ONCAB 4.8%: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; P = 0.011) at 1 year was lower in the OPCAB group. In the multivariable- and the PS-adjusted model, mortality at 10 years was not significantly different (OPCAB 34.1% vs ONCAB 35.7%: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87-1.08; P = 0.59 and HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.13; P = 0.91, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Data do not provide evidence that elective/urgent OPCAB is associated with significantly higher risks of mortality, repeat revascularization, or myocardial infarction during late follow-up when compared to ONCAB. Patients undergoing OPCAB may benefit from reduced risks of stroke and mortality within the first year postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 865
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk-adjusted short- and long-term outcomes for on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Williams, ML
    Muhlbaier, LH
    Schroder, JN
    Hata, JA
    Smith, PK
    Davis, RD
    Landolfo, KP
    Messier, RH
    Peterson, ED
    Milano, CA
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (17) : 587 - 588
  • [2] Risk-adjusted short- and long-term outcomes for on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Williams, ML
    Muhlbaier, LH
    Schroder, JN
    Hata, JA
    Peterson, ED
    Smith, PK
    Landolfo, KP
    Messier, RH
    Davis, RD
    Milano, CA
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (09) : I366 - I370
  • [3] Long-Term Outcomes of On-Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Smart, Neil A.
    Dieberg, Gudrun
    King, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (09) : 983 - 991
  • [4] Off-pump coronary artery bypass is associated with improved risk-adjusted outcomes
    Plomondon, ME
    Cleveland, JC
    Ludwig, ST
    Grunwald, GK
    Kiefe, CI
    Grover, FL
    Shroyer, AL
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (01): : 114 - 119
  • [5] Long-Term Outcomes After Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting by Experienced Surgeons
    Chikwe, Joanna
    Lee, Timothy
    Itagaki, Shinobu
    Adams, David H.
    Egorova, Natalia N.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : 1478 - 1486
  • [6] Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on risk-adjusted and cumulative sum failure outcomes after coronary artery surgery
    Novick, RJ
    Fox, SA
    Stitt, LW
    Kiaii, BB
    Abu-Khudair, W
    Lee, A
    Benmusa, A
    Swinamer, SA
    Rayman, R
    Menkis, AH
    McKenzie, FN
    Quantz, MA
    Boyd, WD
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2002, 17 (06) : 520 - 528
  • [7] Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity
    Cleveland, JC
    Shroyer, ALW
    Chen, AY
    Peterson, E
    Grover, FL
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (04): : 1282 - 1288
  • [8] Long-Term Survival After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Kirmani, Bilal H.
    Brazier, Andrew
    Sriskandarajah, Sanjeevan
    Alshawabkeh, Zeyad
    Gurung, Lokesh
    Azzam, Raed
    Keenan, Daniel J. M.
    Hasan, Ragheb
    Abunasra, Haitham
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 102 (01): : 22 - 27
  • [9] Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity - Discussion
    Arom, I
    Howe, WR
    Cleveland
    Murray, GF
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (04): : 1288 - 1289
  • [10] Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: On-Pump versus Off-Pump Strategies
    Yoo, Jae Suk
    Kim, Joon Bum
    Yun, Sung-Cheol
    Lim, Lae Woong
    Jung, Sung-Ho
    Choo, Suk Jung
    Song, Hyun
    Chung, Cheol Hyun
    Lee, Jae Won
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)