Case-finding for cognitive impairment among people with Type 2 diabetes in primary care using the Test Your Memory and Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination questionnaires: the Cog-ID study

被引:17
|
作者
Koekkoek, P. S. [1 ]
Janssen, J. [1 ]
Kooistra, M. [1 ]
Biesbroek, J. M. [2 ]
Groeneveld, O. [2 ]
van den Berg, E. [2 ,3 ]
Kappelle, L. J. [2 ]
Biessels, G. J. [2 ]
Rutten, G. E. H. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Neurol, Brain Ctr Rudolf Magnus, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Expt Psychol, Helmholtz Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
SCREENING INSTRUMENT; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; JAPANESE VERSION; DEMENTIA; TYM; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1111/dme.12874
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate two cognitive tests for case-finding for cognitive impairment in older patients with Type 2 diabetes. Methods Of 1243 invited patients with Type 2 diabetes, aged >= 70 years, 228 participated in a prospective cohort study. Exclusion criteria were: diagnosis of dementia; previous investigation at a memory clinic; and inability to write or read. Patients first filled out two self-administered cognitive tests (Test Your Memory and Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination). Secondly, a general practitioner, blinded to Test Your Memory and Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination scores, performed a structured evaluation using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Subsequently, patients suspected of cognitive impairment (on either the cognitive tests or general practitioner evaluation) and a random sample of 30% of patients not suspected of cognitive impairment were evaluated at a memory clinic. Diagnostic accuracy and area under the curve were determined for the Test Your Memory, Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination and general practitioner evaluation compared with a memory clinic evaluation to detect cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment or dementia). Results A total of 44 participants were diagnosed with cognitive impairment. The Test Your Memory and Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination questionnaires had negative predictive values of 81 and 85%, respectively. Positive predictive values were 39 and 40%, respectively. The general practitioner evaluation had a negative predictive value of 83% and positive predictive value of 64%. The area under the curve was similar to 0.70 for all tests. Conclusions Both the tests evaluated in the present study can easily be used in case-finding strategies for cognitive impairment in patients with Type 2 diabetes in primary care. The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination had the best diagnostic accuracy and therefore we would have a slight preference for this test. Applying the Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination would considerably reduce the number of patients in whom the general practitioner needs to evaluate cognitive functioning to tailor diabetes treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:812 / 819
页数:8
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] People with type 2 diabetes and screen-detected cognitive impairment use acute health care services more often: observations from the COG-ID study
    Janssen, Jolien
    Koekkoek, Paula S.
    Biessels, Geert Jan
    Kappelle, L. Jaap
    Rutten, Guy E. H. M.
    Janssen, Jolien
    Koekkoek, Paula S.
    Kooistra, Minke
    Rutten, Guy E. H. M.
    Biessels, Geert Jan
    Kappelle, L. Jaap
    van den Berg, Esther
    Biesbroek, J. Matthijs
    Groeneveld, Onno
    DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2019, 11 (1):
  • [2] People with type 2 diabetes and screen-detected cognitive impairment use acute health care services more often: observations from the COG-ID study
    Jolien Janssen
    Paula S. Koekkoek
    Geert Jan Biessels
    L. Jaap Kappelle
    Guy E. H. M. Rutten
    Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 11