共 50 条
Radiopharmacokinetics, renal clearance and dosimetry of 99mTc-MAG3
被引:0
|作者:
de Murphy, CA
Molina-Trinidad, E
Meléndez-Alafort, L
Ferro-Flores, G
Reyes-Herrera, L
Sepúlveda-Méndez, J
Sandoval-Guzmán, B
Hoyo-Vadillo, C
机构:
[1] Inst Nacl Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Nucl Med & Clin Tiroides, Mexico City 14000, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Div Estudios Posgrado Biofarm, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[3] Inst Nacl Invest Nucl, Dept Reactor & Mat Radiactivos, Mexico City 11801, DF, Mexico
[4] CINVESTAV, Dept Farmacol & Toxicol, Ctr Invest & Estud Avanzados, Inst Politecn Nacl, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
来源:
关键词:
technetium-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine;
Radiopharmacokinetic clearance;
D O I:
10.1016/S0188-0128(98)00004-9
中图分类号:
R-3 [医学研究方法];
R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Background. Technetium-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine ((TC)-T-99m-MAG(3)) is a radiopharmaceutical for tubular function and can be prepared with 99m-technetium and the ligand Bz-MAG(3) (Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Mexico City). No radiopharmacokinetic parameters have been found for the healthy adult Mexican population with Tc-99m-MAG(3), prepared with the nationally produced or imported Bz-MAG(3) kit. Methods, The radiopharmacokinetic parameters and the clearance of Tc-99m-MAG(3) in seven healthy Mexican volunteers were determined by the single- and multi-sample methods, Computer programs were used for the calculations. Results. Using several plasma samples from 0-43 min and the BIEXP program, it was shown that (TC)-T-99m-MAG(3) follows a two-compartment model of distribution, with an apparent volume in the central compartment Vd(cc) 3.8 + 0.7 l, a volume of distribution at steady state Vd(ss) 6.7 + 1.01, T-1/2 alpha = 0.07 + 0.02 h(-1), T-1/2 beta = 0.49 + 0.15 h(-1), mean residence time MRT = 0.60 + 0.17 h and clearance = 208 + 57 (ml/min)/1.73 m(2). In comparison, the clearance value with a single sample drawn 33 min post-injection and cal culated with Tauxe's formula was 193 +/- 59 (ml/min)/m(2) Conclusions. The 15 mi difference between the two methods is neither statistically different (p = 0.11) nor important for routine clinical studies. The single-sample method is recommended because it is reliable and can be done at the same time that the dynamic renal scan is acquired. Estimated absorbed radiation dose was calculated for several organs. (C) 1999 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 54
页数:6
相关论文