One HACCP, Two Approaches: Experiences With and Perceptions of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Food Safety Management Systems in the United States and the EU

被引:6
|
作者
Hyde, Richard [1 ]
Hoflund, A. Bryce [2 ]
Pautz, Michelle [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Law, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nebraska, Sch Publ Adm, 6001 Dodge St,CPACS 113D, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
[3] Univ Dayton, Dept Polit Sci, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point system; food safety regulation; European Union; United States; democratic experimentalism; food safety management systems;
D O I
10.1177/0095399714548266
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article explores the differences in the use of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) system to manage food safety risks in the food chain from farm to fork in the EU and the United States. In particular, this article investigates the current uses and potential expansion of HACCP as a mechanism for the delivery of safe agricultural products, particularly safe produce. Using data derived from semi-structured interviews with regulatory actors in the EU and the United States, this article argues that the different approach to HACCP is a result of differing ideas about the role that it plays in the governance of food safety and the different concepts of the role of regulation in securing safe food. Finally, the article explores the difficulties of utilizing HACCP to manage produce safety risks and raises further challenges that must be met to ensure that HACCP can successfully fulfill its potential as a governance mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 987
页数:26
相关论文
共 41 条