Disjoint representability of sets and their complements

被引:10
|
作者
Balogh, J [1 ]
Keevash, P
Sudakov, B
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Math Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Math, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Inst Adv Study, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
set systems; trace; extremal problems;
D O I
10.1016/j.jctb.2005.02.005
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
For a hypergraph H and a set S, the trace of W on S is the set of all intersections of edges of R with S. We will consider forbidden trace problems, in which we want to find the largest hypergraph W that does not contain some list of forbidden configurations as traces, possibly with some restriction on the number of vertices or the size of the edges in H. In this paper we will focus on combinations of three forbidden configurations: the k-singleton [k]((1)), the k-co-singleton [k]((k-1)) and the k-chain C-k = {0, {1}, [1, 2],..., [1, k-1]}, where we write [k]((l)) for the set of all l-subsets of [k]={1,..., k}. Our main topic is hypergraphs with no k-singleton or k-co-singleton trace. We obtain an exact result in the case k = 3, both for uniform and non-uniform hypergraphs, and classify the extremal examples. In the general case, we show that the number of edges in the largest r-uniform hypergraph with no k-singleton or k-co-singleton trace is of order r(k-2). By contrast, Frankl and Pach showed that the number of edges in the largest r-uniform hypergraph with no k-singleton trace is of order r(k-1). We also give a very short proof of the recent result of Balogh and Bollobas that there is a finite bound on the number of sets in any hypergraph without a k-singleton, k-co-singleton or k-chain trace, independently of the number of vertices or the size of the edges. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 28
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The balls do not generate all Borel sets using complements and countable disjoint unions
    Keleti, T
    Preiss, D
    MATHEMATICAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 128 : 539 - 547
  • [2] RIGOROUS REPRESENTABILITY OF SETS BY CALCULI
    MASLOV, SI
    DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1963, 152 (02): : 272 - &
  • [3] On crossing sets, disjoint sets, and pagenumber
    Shahrokhi, F
    Shi, WP
    JOURNAL OF ALGORITHMS, 2000, 34 (01) : 40 - 53
  • [4] Disjoint sets of distinct sum sets
    Chen, WD
    Klove, T
    DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 1997, 175 (1-3) : 69 - 77
  • [5] ON DISJOINT SETS OF DIFFERENCES
    ERDOS, P
    FREUD, R
    JOURNAL OF NUMBER THEORY, 1984, 18 (01) : 99 - 109
  • [6] Sets, complements and boundaries
    Bridges, D
    Richman, F
    Wang, YC
    INDAGATIONES MATHEMATICAE-NEW SERIES, 1996, 7 (04): : 425 - 445
  • [7] ALMOST DISJOINT SETS
    KETONEN, J
    NOTICES OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 1974, 21 (06): : A557 - A557
  • [8] ALMOST DISJOINT SETS
    MILNER, EC
    AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 1967, 74 (04): : 447 - &
  • [9] DISJOINT TRIANGULAR SETS
    SHULT, E
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS, 1980, 111 (01) : 67 - 94
  • [10] Complements of coalescing sets
    Butler, Steve
    D’Avanzo, Elena
    Heikkinen, Rachel
    Jeffries, Joel
    Kruczek, Alyssa
    Niergarth, Harper
    arXiv, 2022,