Comparisons of nanoindentation, 3-point bending, and tension tests for orthodontic wires

被引:37
|
作者
Iijima, Masahiro [1 ]
Muguruma, Takeshi [1 ]
Brantley, William A. [2 ]
Mizoguchi, Itaru [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Univ Hokkaido, Div Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Dept Oral Growth & Dev, Sch Dent, Ishikari, Hokkaido 0610293, Japan
[2] Ohio State Univ, Div Restorat & Prosthet Dent, Coll Dent, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; ARCHWIRES; BEHAVIOR; HARDNESS; ENAMEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purposes of this study were to obtain information about mechanical properties with the nano-indentation test for representative wire alloys and compare the results with conventional mechanical tests. Methods: Archwires having 0.016 x 0.022-in cross sections were obtained of 1 stainless steel, 1 cobalt-chromium-nickel, 1 beta-titanium alloy, and 2 nickel-titanium products. Specimens of as-received wires were subjected to nanoindentation testing along the external surfaces and over polished cross sections to obtain values of hardness and elastic modulus. Other specimens of as-received wires were subjected to Vickers hardness, 3-point bending, and tension tests. All testing was performed at 25 degrees C. Results: Differences were found in hardness and elastic modulus obtained with the nanoindentation test at the external and cross-sectioned surfaces and with the conventional mechanical-property tests. Mechanical properties obtained with the nanoindentation test generally varied with indentation depth. Conclusions: The 3 testing methods did not yield identical values of hardness and elastic modulus, although the order among the 5 wire products was the same. Variations in results for the nanoindentation and conventional mechanical property tests can be attributed to the different material volumes sampled, different work-hardening levels, and an oxide layer on the wire surface. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:65-71)
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 71
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF BENDING AND TENSION TESTS FOR ORTHODONTIC WIRES
    ASGHARNIA, MK
    BRANTLEY, WA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1986, 89 (03) : 228 - 236
  • [2] COMPARISON OF BENDING AND TENSION TESTS FOR ORTHODONTIC WIRES
    ASGHARNIA, M
    BRANTLEY, W
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1984, 63 : 296 - 296
  • [3] BENDING OF SUPERELASTIC WIRES .2. APPLICATION TO 3-POINT BENDING
    BERG, BT
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1995, 62 (02): : 466 - 470
  • [4] Force levels of fiber-reinforced composites and orthodontic stainless steel wires: A 3-point bending test
    Cacciafesta, Vittorio
    Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
    Lena, Alessandro
    Scribante, Andrea
    Vallittu, Pekka K.
    Lassila, Lippo V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 133 (03) : 410 - 413
  • [5] Fatigue simulation of GFR composites in 3-point bending tests
    Lima, AMV
    Marques, AT
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2005, 12 (1-2): : 159 - 165
  • [6] Particularities of testing structured sheet metals in 3-point bending tests
    Kazak, Fedor
    Schleuss, Leander
    Ossenbrink, Ralf
    Michailov, Vesselin
    Weiss, Sabine
    MATERIALS TESTING, 2016, 58 (06) : 495 - 500
  • [7] COMPARISON OF STIFFNESS AND TRANSVERSE BENDING TESTS FOR ORTHODONTIC WIRES
    BRANTLEY, WA
    BLAKE, RE
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 58 : 255 - 255
  • [8] BRITTLE RING TEST - A COMPARISON WITH THE 3-POINT AND 4-POINT BENDING TESTS
    FREY, T
    GROZ, K
    HOLLER, J
    ZEHM, K
    CFI-CERAMIC FORUM INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 72 (06): : 333 - 337
  • [9] MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES OF ORTHODONTIC WIRES IN TENSION, BENDING, AND TORSION
    DRAKE, SR
    WAYNE, DM
    POWERS, JM
    ASGAR, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1982, 82 (03) : 206 - 210
  • [10] Statistics of Fracture in 3-Point Bending
    Sadhinoch, M.
    Kampczyk, M.
    Mulder, R.
    38TH INTERNATIONAL DEEP DRAWING RESEARCH GROUP ANNUAL CONFERENCE (IDDRG 2019), 2019, 651