The paradoxes of permission an action based solution
被引:3
|
作者:
Gabbay, Dov
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Comp Sci, IL-52100 Ramat Gan, Israel
Kings Coll London, Dept Informat, London WC2R 2LS, England
Univ Luxembourg, Fac Sci Technol & Commun, Luxembourg, LuxembourgBar Ilan Univ, Dept Comp Sci, IL-52100 Ramat Gan, Israel
Gabbay, Dov
[1
,2
,3
]
Gammaitoni, Loic
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Luxembourg, Lab Adv Software Syst LASSY, Luxembourg, LuxembourgBar Ilan Univ, Dept Comp Sci, IL-52100 Ramat Gan, Israel
Gammaitoni, Loic
[4
]
Sun, Xin
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Luxembourg, Fac Sci Technol & Commun, Luxembourg, LuxembourgBar Ilan Univ, Dept Comp Sci, IL-52100 Ramat Gan, Israel
Sun, Xin
[3
]
机构:
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Comp Sci, IL-52100 Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Kings Coll London, Dept Informat, London WC2R 2LS, England
[3] Univ Luxembourg, Fac Sci Technol & Commun, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Deontic logic permission;
Actions;
Contrary to duty obligations;
LOGIC;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jal.2014.01.003
中图分类号:
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号:
081104 ;
0812 ;
0835 ;
1405 ;
摘要:
The aim of this article is to construct a deontic logic in which the free choice postulate allow (Ross, 1941) [11] would be consistent and all the implausible result mentioned in (Hanson, in press) [5] will be blocked. To achieve this we first developed a new theory of action. Then we build a new deontic logic in which the deontic action operator and the deontic proposition operator are explicitly distinguished. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.