Objective and subjective measures of vergence step responses

被引:12
|
作者
Jainta, S. [1 ]
Hoormann, J. [1 ]
Jaschinski, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dortmund, Inst Arbeitsphysiol, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany
关键词
nonius lines; vergence eye movements; disparity; step response;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Dichoptic nonius lines are used for subjectively (psychophysically) measuring vergence states, but they have been questioned as valid indicators of vergence eye position. In a mirror-stereoscope, we presented convergent and divergent step-stimuli and estimated the vergence response with nonius lines flashed at fixed delays after the disparity step stimulus. For each delay, an adaptive psychophysical procedure was run to determine the physical nonius offset required for subjective alignment; these vergence states were compared with objective eye movement recordings. Between both measures of initial vergence, we calculated the maximal cross-correlation coefficient: the median in our sample was about 0.9 for convergence and divergence, suggesting a good agreement. Relative to the objective measures, the subjective method revealed a smaller vergence velocity and a larger vergence response in the final phase of the response, but both measures were well correlated. The dynamic nonius test is therefore considered to be useful to relatively evaluate a subject's ability in disparity vergence. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3238 / 3246
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence
    Jaschinski, Wolfgang
    Jainta, Stephanie
    Hoormann, Joerg
    Walper, Nina
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2007, 27 (01) : 85 - 92
  • [2] A comparison of objective and psychophysical measurements of step responses in disparity vergence eye movements
    Jainta, S.
    Hoormann, W. J.
    PERCEPTION, 2006, 35 : 27 - 27
  • [3] SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE MEASURES
    KATONA, G
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1976, 31 (08) : 617 - 617
  • [4] Accommodation mediates the difference between objective and subjective measures of the convergence step response
    Jainta, S.
    Hoormann, J.
    Jaschinski, W.
    PERCEPTION, 2008, 37 : 14 - 14
  • [5] Objective and Subjective Methods to Measure Fusional Vergence: An Agreement Study
    Rovira-Gay, Cristina
    Mestre, Clara
    Argiles, Marc
    Pujol, Jaume
    PERCEPTION, 2021, 50 (1_SUPPL) : 60 - 60
  • [6] OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF DISTRACTIBILITY
    AUSTIN, SV
    HEMSLEY, DR
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1978, 12 (03) : 182 - 184
  • [7] Vergence errors during short fixations between disparity vergence step responses
    Hoormann, J.
    Jainta, S.
    Jaschinski, W.
    PERCEPTION, 2008, 37 : 14 - 14
  • [8] Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence
    Jaschinski, Wolfgang
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [9] Subjective or Objective? How Objective Measures Relate to Subjective Life Satisfaction in Europe
    Macku, Karel
    Caha, Jan
    Paszto, Vit
    Tucek, Pavel
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (05)
  • [10] SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE MEASURES OF JOURNAL STATURE
    DOMETRIUS, NC
    SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1989, 70 (01) : 197 - 203