Empowering patients or general practitioners? A randomised clinical trial to improve quality in reproductive health care in Belgium

被引:4
|
作者
Peremans, Lieve [1 ,2 ]
Rethans, Jan Joost [3 ]
Verhoeven, Veronique [1 ]
Coenen, Samuel [1 ]
Debaene, Luc [1 ]
Meulemans, Herman [4 ]
Denekens, Joke [1 ]
Van Royen, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Primary & Interdisciplinary Care, Fac Med, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Publ Hlth, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Maastricht, Skills Lab, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Antwerp, Fac Polit & Social Sci, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Adolescents; Contraception; Consultation; Standardised patient; Computer decision support; Empowered patient; EVIDENCE BASED GUIDELINES; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEMS; SIMULATED PATIENTS; PRACTICE CONSULTATIONS; STANDARDIZED PATIENTS; CONTRACEPTION; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; IMPLEMENTATION; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.3109/13625187.2010.492882
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Evidence-based clinical guidelines on contraceptive use were developed and distributed among all Flemish general practitioners (GPs) in Belgium. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of two strategies for implementing a guideline on oral contraceptives in order to enhance the quality of the first contraception consultation in general practice, by either empowering patients or by introducing a computer decision support system (CDSS). Method A random sample of 45 GPs was distributed among three study groups. One group was visited by an 'empowered patient', one group's electronic medical record was supplemented with a CDSS, and one group served as the control group. Simulated patients (SPs) assessed the performance of GPs in daily practice before and after the interventions, using a validated 48-point checklist. Results The baseline mean score of the 43 GPs was 26.16 (SD =5.76). The SPs received sufficient information about correct pill usage, but not concerning factors associated with pill failure and drug interaction. After the intervention, the GPs' mean score was 26.39 (SD = 6.86). Only the intervention group with the 'empowered patient' scored significantly better (29.92 [SD = 7.11]). The computer group and control group scored lower (24.36 [SD = 6.601 and 24.82 [SD = 5.65], respectively). Conclusion Developing and distributing an evidence-based guideline did not change GPs' behaviour. However, empowering patients to participate more proactively significantly improved GPs' performance during a contraception consultation. A CDSS did not.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 289
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How can General practitioners improve the quality of their care?
    Deter, H. C.
    Dilg, R.
    Mitzenegg, P.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2018, 109 : 98 - 98
  • [2] A randomised controlled trial to improve the role of the general practitioner in cancer rehabilitation: effect on patients' satisfaction with their general practitioners
    Bergholdt, Stinne Holm
    Hansen, Dorte Gilsa
    Larsen, Pia Veldt
    Kragstrup, Jakob
    Sondergaard, Jens
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (07):
  • [3] A randomised controlled trial to improve general practitioners' services in cancer rehabilitation: Effects on general practitioners' proactivity and on patients' participation in rehabilitation activities
    Bergholdt, Stinne Holm
    Sondergaard, Jens
    Larsen, Pia Veldt
    Holm, Lise Vilstrup
    Kragstrup, Jakob
    Hansen, Dorte Gilsa
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (02) : 400 - 409
  • [4] Evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners in adolescent health care: randomised controlled trial
    Sanci, LA
    Coffey, CMM
    Veit, FCM
    Carr-Gregg, M
    Patton, GC
    Day, E
    Bowes, G
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7229): : 224 - 229
  • [5] Psychosocial interventions by general practitioners improve health outcome of somatizing patients in primary care. First results of a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Fritzsche, K
    Larisch, A
    Schweickhardt, A
    Wirsching, M
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2002, 64 (01): : 133 - 133
  • [6] Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial
    Feder, G
    Griffiths, C
    Eldridge, S
    Spence, M
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7197): : 1522 - 1526
  • [7] Do case conferences between general practitioners and specialist palliative care services improve quality of life? A randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN 52269003)
    Mitchell, G. K.
    Del Mar, C. B.
    O'Rourke, P. K.
    Clavarino, A. M.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 22 (08) : 904 - 912
  • [8] Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care
    Venning, P
    Durie, A
    Roland, M
    Roberts, C
    Leese, B
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7241): : 1048 - 1053
  • [9] Physical therapy plus general practitioners’ care versus general practitioners’ care alone for sciatica: a randomised clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up
    Pim A. J. Luijsterburg
    Arianne P. Verhagen
    Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo
    Hans J. M. M. van den Hoogen
    Wilco C. Peul
    Cees J. J. Avezaat
    Bart W. Koes
    European Spine Journal, 2008, 17 : 509 - 517
  • [10] Physical therapy plus general practitioners' care versus general practitioners' care alone for sciatica: a randomised clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up
    Luijsterburg, Pim A. J.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    van den Hoogen, Hans J. M. M.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Avezaat, Cees J. J.
    Koes, Bart W.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (04) : 509 - 517