How and when top manager authentic leadership influences team voice: A moderated mediation model

被引:21
|
作者
Zheng, Xiaoming [1 ]
Liu, Xin [2 ]
Liao, Hui [3 ]
Qin, Xin [4 ]
Ni, Dan [4 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Renmin Business Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Business Sch, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Team voice; Top manager authentic leadership; Middle manager authentic leadership; Power distance orientation; Moderated mediation model; POWER DISTANCE; EMPLOYEE VOICE; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; ABUSIVE SUPERVISION; ETHICAL LEADERSHIP; CROSS-LEVEL; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; PROHIBITIVE VOICE; MEMBER EXCHANGE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.073
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Extant research has primarily investigated the influence of middle managers on team voice. Extending this line of research, our work goes beyond the impact of middle managers by examining the role of top manager authentic leadership. Integrating social learning theory with authentic leadership theory, we argue that top manager authentic leadership indirectly affects team voice through middle manager authentic leadership. Furthermore, we investigate the moderating effect of middle manager power distance orientation on the mediation process. Results based on a two-wave, multiple-source, team-based field study support the cascading influence of top manager authentic leadership on team voice through middle manager authentic leadership. Middle manager power distance orientation enhances the relationship between top manager authentic leadership and middle manager authentic leadership, thereby strengthening the indirect effect of top manager authentic leadership on team voice through middle manager authentic leadership.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 155
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How and when authentic leadership promotes prosocial service behaviors: A moderated mediation model
    Teng, Hsiu-Yu
    O-Yang, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 104
  • [2] How Humble Leadership Influences the Innovation of Technology Standards: A Moderated Mediation Model
    Jiang, Hong
    Liu, Wentao
    Jia, Lili
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [3] Transformational leadership and teachers' voice behaviour: A moderated mediation model of group voice climate and team psychological safety
    Wang, Guanghui
    Li, Jiahui
    Liu, Hui
    Zaggia, Cristina
    EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION & LEADERSHIP, 2025, 53 (01) : 102 - 122
  • [4] How and when servant leadership promotes service innovation: A moderated mediation model
    Li, Fengyu
    Liu, Bing
    Lin, Weipeng
    Wei, Xin
    Xu, Zikun
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 86
  • [5] How and when responsible leadership facilitates work engagement: a moderated mediation model
    Dong, Wenli
    Zhong, Lifeng
    JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 37 (06) : 545 - 558
  • [6] The effect of ambidextrous leadership on employee voice: A moderated mediation model
    Peng, Gui-Liang
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2020, 48 (10):
  • [7] Inclusive leadership and employees’ voice behavior: A moderated mediation model
    Jianwu Jiang
    Wanling Ding
    Rong Wang
    Saisai Li
    Current Psychology, 2022, 41 : 6395 - 6405
  • [8] Inclusive leadership and employees' voice behavior: A moderated mediation model
    Jiang, Jianwu
    Ding, Wanling
    Wang, Rong
    Li, Saisai
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 41 (09) : 6395 - 6405
  • [9] Top Management Team Shared Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity: a Moderated Mediation Framework
    Mihalache, Oli R.
    Jansen, Justin J. P.
    Van den Bosch, Frans A. J.
    Volberda, Henk W.
    STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (02) : 128 - 148
  • [10] How Authentic Leadership Influences Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Team Reflexivity
    Joanne Lyubovnikova
    Alison Legood
    Nicola Turner
    Argyro Mamakouka
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 141 : 59 - 70