Membrane fouling mitigation in different biofilm membrane bioreactors with pre-anoxic tanks for treating mariculture wastewater

被引:32
|
作者
Wang, Hanqing [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zhang, Huining [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Kefeng [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Qian, Yongxing [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Yuan, Xin [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ji, Bixiao [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Han, Wanling [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ningbo Inst Technol, Ningbo 315000, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Polytech Inst, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Ningbo Res Inst, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
[4] Ningbo Key Lab Urban & Rural Water Pollut Control, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biofilm MBR with pre-anoxic tank; Membrane fouling; Extracellular polymeric substances; Biofouling; Saline wastewater; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; MICROBIAL PRODUCTS SMP; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; BIOMASS CHARACTERISTICS; SP NOV; PERFORMANCE; SALINITY; COMMUNITY; CARRIERS; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138311
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study compared the membrane fouling mitigation in two novel types of biofilm membrane bioreactor coupled with a pre-anoxic tank (BF-AO-MBR)-namely a fixed biofilm membrane bioreactor (FB-MBR) with fiber bundle bio-carriers and a moving-bed biofilm membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) with suspended bio-carriers-relative to an anoxic/oxic MBR (AO-MBR), at salinities ranging from zero to 60 g/L. The results showed that the FB-MBR mitigated membrane fouling to a greater degree than the MB-MBR and AO-MBR. During operation, the FB-MBR exhibited the lowest fouling development, with three membrane filtration cycles, while the AO-MBR and MB-MBR had 22 and nine cycles, respectively. The key fouling factor in all reactors was cake layer resistance (R-C), which contributed to 89.61, 62.20, and 83.17% of the total fouling resistance (R-T) in AO-MBR, FB-MBR and MB-MBR, respectively. Additionally, in the FB-MBR, the pore blocking resistance (30.07%) was also an important cause of fouling. Fiber bundle bio-carriers and suspended bio-carriers reduced the R-T by 37.68% and 21.24% (mainly the R-C) compared to that of AO-MBR. Furthermore, FB-MBR and MB-MBR caused a decrease of suspended biomass (80.14 and 15.90%, respectively), and the latter exhibited a higher sludge particle size than AO-MBR, possibly resulting in the cake layer decline. The studied BF-AO-MBRs further alleviated the fouling propensity by reducing the amount of soluble microbial product (SMP) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) under all salinity levels, especially the FB-MBR. Among the protein components, the amounts of tryptophan protein-like substance and aromatic protein-like substance were significantly lower in the FB-MBR compared to the AO-MBR and MB-MBR. Additionally, at 60 g/L salinity, the structure of the microbial community in the FB-MBR had a lower abundance of Bacteroidetes and more biomacromolecule degraders, which may have contributed to the moderation of membrane fouling. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance and microbial communities of different biofilm membrane bioreactors with pre-anoxic tanks treating mariculture wastewater
    Zhang, Huining
    Wang, Hanqing
    Jie, Mengrui
    Zhang, Kefeng
    Qian, Yongxing
    Ma, Jianqing
    Bioresource Technology, 2020, 295
  • [2] Performance and microbial communities of different biofilm membrane bioreactors with pre-anoxic tanks treating mariculture wastewater
    Zhang, Huining
    Wang, Hanqing
    Jie, Mengrui
    Zhang, Kefeng
    Qian, Yongxing
    Ma, Jianqing
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 295
  • [3] Unraveling membrane fouling in anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactors treating anaerobically digested piggery wastewater
    Niu, Zhihao
    Guo, Huizhen
    Zhou, Yun
    Xia, Siqing
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (01):
  • [4] Critical review of fouling mitigation strategies in membrane bioreactors treating water and wastewater
    Bagheri, Majid
    Mirbagheri, Sayed Ahmad
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 258 : 318 - 334
  • [5] Performance and Microbial Community of Different Biofilm Membrane Bioreactors Treating Antibiotic-Containing Synthetic Mariculture Wastewater
    Zhang, Huining
    Yuan, Xin
    Wang, Hanging
    Ma, Shuoqi
    Ji, Bixiao
    MEMBRANES, 2020, 10 (10) : 1 - 12
  • [6] Membrane fouling mitigation in a moving bed membrane bioreactor combined with anoxic biofilter for treatment of saline wastewater from mariculture
    Song, Weilong
    You, Hong
    Li, Zhipeng
    Liu, Feng
    Qi, Peishi
    Wang, Fang
    Li, Yizhu
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 243 : 1051 - 1058
  • [7] Seasonal variation in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater
    Miyoshi, Taro
    Tsuyuhara, Tomoo
    Ogyu, Rie
    Kimura, Katsuki
    Watanabe, Yoshimasa
    WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (20) : 5109 - 5118
  • [8] Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment
    Chang, IS
    Le Clech, P
    Jefferson, B
    Judd, S
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (11) : 1018 - 1029
  • [9] Advanced strategies for mitigation of membrane fouling in anaerobic membrane bioreactors for sustainable wastewater treatment
    Min, Sojin
    Lee, Hosung
    Deng, Lijuan
    Guo, Wenshan
    Xu, Boyan
    Mehmood, Ch. Tahir
    Zhong, Ziyi
    Zamora, Ricardo
    Khan, Eakalak
    Dash, Smruti Ranjan
    Kim, Jeonghwan
    Pishnamazi, Mohammad
    Park, Pyung-Kyu
    Chae, Soryong R.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 485
  • [10] Influence of different biofilm carriers on the operation and membrane fouling of submerged membrane bioreactors
    Kurita, Tokihiro
    Mogi, Takuma
    Kimura, Katsuki
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 169 : 43 - 49