Influence of financial productivity incentives on the use of preventive care

被引:22
|
作者
Wee, CC
Phillips, RS
Burstin, HR
Cook, EF
Puopolo, AL
Brennan, TA
Haas, JS
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Med, Div Gen Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Div Gen Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] San Francisco Gen Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2001年 / 110卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00692-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: We examined whether physician factors, particularly financial productivity incentives, affect the provision of preventive care. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We surveyed and reviewed the charts of 4,473 patients who saw 1 of 169 internists from 11 academically affiliated primary care practices in Boston. We abstracted cancer risk factors, comorbid conditions, and the dates of the last Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, mammogram, cholesterol screening, and influenza vaccination. We obtained physician information including the method of financial compensation through a mailed physician survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between physician factors and four outcomes based on Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures: (1) Pap smear within the prior 3 years among women 20 to 75 years old; (2) mammogram in the prior 2 years among women 52 to 69 years old; (3) cholesterol screening within the prior 5 years among patients 40 to 64 years old; and (4) influenza vaccination among patients 65 years old and older. All analyses accounted for clustering by provider and site and were converted into adjusted rates. RESULTS: After adjustment for practice site, clinical, and physician factors, patients cared for by physicians with financial productivity incentives were significantly less likely than those cared for by physicians without this incentive to receive Pap smears (rate difference, 12%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5% to 18%) and cholesterol screening (rate difference, 4%; 95% CI: 0% to 8%). Financial incentives were not significantly associated with rates of mammography (rate difference, -3%; 95% CI: -15% to 10%) or influenza vaccination (rate difference, -13%; 95% CI: -28% to 2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that some financial productivity incentives may discourage the performance of certain forms of preventive care, Specifically Pap smears and cholesterol screening. More studies are needed to examine the effects of financial incentives on the quality of care, and to examine whether quality improvement interventions or incentives based on quality improve the performance of preventive care. (C)2001 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 187
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Only human? The effect of financial productivity incentives on physicians' use of preventive care measures
    Brukner, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 110 (03): : 226 - 228
  • [2] The use of physician financial incentives and feedback to improve pediatric preventive care in Medicaid managed care
    Hillman, AL
    Ripley, K
    Goldfarb, N
    Weiner, J
    Nuamah, I
    Lusk, E
    PEDIATRICS, 1999, 104 (04) : 931 - 935
  • [3] FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO RAISE PRODUCTIVITY
    LAUFER, A
    BORCHERDING, JD
    JOURNAL OF THE CONSTRUCTION DIVISION-ASCE, 1981, 107 (04): : 745 - 756
  • [4] FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO RAISE PRODUCTIVITY
    Laufer, Alexander
    Borcherding, John D.
    Journal of the Construction Division, 1981, 107 (04): : 745 - 756
  • [5] FINANCIAL INCENTIVES AND PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT
    JENKINS, GD
    GUPTA, N
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS, 1982, 11 (02): : 43 - 56
  • [6] FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO RAISE PRODUCTIVITY - DISCUSSION
    MALONEY, WF
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1983, 109 (04): : 475 - 477
  • [7] IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY WITH FINANCIAL INCENTIVES.
    Wygant, Robert M.
    Engineering management international, 1987, 4 (02): : 87 - 93
  • [8] How are primary care organizations using financial incentives to influence prescribing?
    Ashworth, M
    Lea, R
    Gray, H
    Rowlands, G
    Gravelle, H
    Majeed, A
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 26 (01) : 48 - 51
  • [9] Influence of financial and reputational incentives on primary care performance: a longitudinal study
    Allen, Thomas
    Whittaker, William
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Sutton, Matt
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (677): : E811 - E818
  • [10] Financial incentives and pesticide use
    Zilberman, D
    Millock, K
    FOOD POLICY, 1997, 22 (02) : 133 - 144