Development of a lupus nephritis suboptimal response prediction tool using renal histopathological and clinical laboratory variables at the time of diagnosis

被引:14
|
作者
Helget, Lindsay N. [1 ,2 ]
Dillon, David J. [1 ]
Wolf, Bethany [3 ]
Parks, Laura P. [1 ]
Self, Sally E. [4 ]
Bruner, Evelyn T. [4 ]
Oates, Evan E. [5 ]
Oates, Jim C. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Med, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Omaha, NE 68105 USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[6] Ralph H Johnson VA Med Ctr, Med Serv, Charleston, SC 29401 USA
来源
LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE | 2021年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
lupus nephritis; outcome assessment; health care; lupus erythematosus; systemic; OUTCOMES; CLASSIFICATION; PATHOLOGY; FEATURES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1136/lupus-2021-000489
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Lupus nephritis (LN) is an immune complex-mediated glomerular and tubulointerstitial disease in patients with SLE. Prediction of outcomes at the onset of LN diagnosis can guide decisions regarding intensity of monitoring and therapy for treatment success. Currently, no machine learning model of outcomes exists. Several outcomes modelling works have used univariate or linear modelling but were limited by the disease heterogeneity. We hypothesised that a combination of renal pathology results and routine clinical laboratory data could be used to develop and to cross-validate a clinically meaningful machine learning early decision support tool that predicts LN outcomes at approximately 1 year. Methods To address this hypothesis, patients with LN from a prospective longitudinal registry at the Medical University of South Carolina enrolled between 2003 and 2017 were identified if they had renal biopsies with International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society pathological classification. Clinical laboratory values at the time of diagnosis and outcome variables at approximately 1 year were recorded. Machine learning models were developed and cross-validated to predict suboptimal response. Results Five machine learning models predicted suboptimal response status in 10 times cross-validation with receiver operating characteristics area under the curve values >0.78. The most predictive variables were interstitial inflammation, interstitial fibrosis, activity score and chronicity score from renal pathology and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, white blood cell count and haemoglobin from the clinical laboratories. A web-based tool was created for clinicians to enter these baseline clinical laboratory and histopathology variables to produce a probability score of suboptimal response. Conclusion Given the heterogeneity of disease presentation in LN, it is important that risk prediction models incorporate several data elements. This report provides for the first time a clinical proof-of-concept tool that uses the five most predictive models and simplifies understanding of them through a web-based application.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Factors predicting development of lupus nephritis in the patients without clinical lupus nephritis at the time of renal biopsy.
    Sakurai, Tadashi
    Kitahama, Mariko
    Itoh, Miki
    Koseki, Yumi
    Kamatani, Naoyuki
    Terai, Chihiro
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (09): : S429 - S430
  • [2] Clinical and Serologic Variables Associated with Renal Response Among Lupus Nephritis Phase III Trial Patients Treated with Standard of Care Immunosuppression
    Cascino, Matthew D.
    Lambert, Peter
    Decker, Anna
    Katsumoto, Tamiko
    Garg, Jay
    Brunetta, Paul
    Dall'Era, Maria
    Dragone, Leonard L.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [3] Predicting Response to Antitumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using an Extended Set of Clinical and Laboratory Variables Remains Suboptimal
    Nam Nguyen
    Bernatsky, Sasha
    Colmegna, Ines
    Allard-Chamard, Hugues
    Roux, Sophie
    Liang, Patrick
    Carrier, Nathalie
    Berger, Claudie
    Boire, Gilles
    Hudson, Marie
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 51 : 87 - 88
  • [4] PREDICTION OF DISEASE PROGRESSION INCLUDING DURABLE RESPONSE TO HORMONAL THERAPY AT DIAGNOSIS, USING THE PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY AND PRETREATMENT CLINICAL VARIABLES
    Donovan, Michael J.
    Khan, Faisal
    Fernandez, Gerardo
    Mesa-Tejada, Ricardo
    Sapir, Marina
    Bayer-Zubek, Valentina
    Fogarsi, Stephen
    Vengrenyuk, Yeygen
    Teverovskiy, Mikhail
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Gaffey, Thomas
    Busch, Christer
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Albertsen, Peter
    Costa, Jose
    Cordon-Cardo, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 771 - 771
  • [5] The Next Generation of Clinical Decision Making Tools: Development of a Real-Time Prediction Tool for Outcome of Prostate Biopsy in Response to a Continuously Evolving Prostate Cancer Landscape
    Strobl, Andreas N.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Ankerst, Donna P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (01): : 58 - 64
  • [6] Development of clinical prediction models for renal and cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease using time-varying predictors
    Ye, Wen
    Ding, Xuemei
    Putnam, Nathaniel
    Farej, Ryan
    Singh, Rakesh
    Wang, Di
    Kuo, Shihchen
    Kong, Sheldon X.
    Elliott, Jay C.
    Lott, Jason
    Herman, William H.
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2022, 36 (05)