Interseeding snap pea into stands of chile pepper reduces yield of pea more than that of Chile

被引:5
|
作者
Guldan, SJ
Martin, CA
Falk, CL
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Alcalde Sustainable Agr Sci Ctr, Alcalde, NM 87511 USA
[2] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Agr Business, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
关键词
multiple cropping; relay intercropping; interplanting; Pisum sativum; Capsicum annuum;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI.33.4.660
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
'Sugar Snap' snap peas (Pisum sativum L.) were interseeded into a stand of 'Espanola Improved' chile pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in July or Aug. in 1995, 1996, and 1997, Peas were interseeded as one or two rows per bed, giving planting rates of about 92 or 184 kg.ha(-1), respectively. Our objectives were to determine: 1) if intercropped pea would reduce chile yield and vice versa; 2) the effects of pea planting rates and dates on pea yield, Intercropped peas reduced chile yield by about 22% in 1995, but had no significant effects in other years. Pea plants from the August intercrops reached the flowering stage but did not produce pods in 1995 or 1996; some small pods were produced from August intercrops in 1997. Final plant densities were lower and less uniform in 1996 than in 1995 or 1997, Intercropped peas yielded less than monocropped peas in all years. Pea yields ranged from 1370 to 3960 kg.ha(-1) when monocropped, 31 kg.ha(-1) (1996 single-row) to 646 kg.ha(-1) (1995 double-row) when intercropped. In 1995 only, the double-row intercrop yielded more peas than the single-row intercrop, Pod yield/plant was reduced 80%, 98%, and 96% in 1995, 1996, and 1997, respectively, by intercropping. Estimated gross revenues for the treatments indicate that, under the price assumptions used in the study, interseeding snap peas into stands of chile in north-central New Mexico is not economically advantageous compared with monocropped chile.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 662
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interseeding legumes into Chile: Legume productivity and effect on Chile yield
    Guldan, SJ
    Martin, CA
    CuetoWong, J
    Steiner, RL
    HORTSCIENCE, 1996, 31 (07) : 1126 - 1128
  • [2] Interseeding forage brassicas into Chile: Forage productivity and effect on Chile yield
    Guldan, SJ
    Martin, CA
    Steiner, RL
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 1998, 11 (2-3): : 41 - 49
  • [3] YIELD OF TOMATO INTERCROPPED WITH SNAP BEAN, PEA AND CABBAGE
    MCLEAN, IB
    RASMUSSEN, HP
    HORTSCIENCE, 1980, 15 (03) : 379 - 379
  • [4] ANTICRUSTANT EFFECTS ON CHILE PEPPER STAND AND YIELD
    MCGRADY, JJ
    COTTER, DJ
    HORTSCIENCE, 1984, 19 (03) : 408 - 409
  • [5] Yield and Yield Component Performance of Chile Pepper in Myanmar and Vietnam
    Barchenger, Derek W.
    Thandar, Khin
    Thain Gi Myint
    Tran Ngoc Hung
    Nguyen Quoc Hung
    Lin, Shih-wen
    Wang, Yen-wei
    Lin, Tsung-han
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) : 463 - 467
  • [6] Intragastric infusion of pea-protein hydrolysate reduces test-meal size in rats more than pea protein
    Haeberer, Doreen
    Tasker, Maria
    Foltz, Martin
    Geary, Nori
    Westerterp, Margriet
    Langhans, Wolfgang
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2011, 104 (05) : 1041 - 1047
  • [7] Chile: Now More Than Ever
    Dorfman, Ariel
    NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS, 2018, 65 (13) : 55 - 57
  • [8] GROWTH AND YIELD RESPONSE OF CHILE PEPPER TO TRICKLE IRRIGATION
    BEESE, F
    HORTON, R
    WIERENGA, PJ
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (03) : 556 - 561
  • [9] Diversity of endosymbiotic bacteria in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) on alfalfa in Chile
    Zepeda-Paulo, Francisca
    Lavandero, Blas
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (01): : 63 - 69
  • [10] Planting date effects on stand establishment and yield of Chile pepper
    Bevacqua, RF
    VanLeeuwen, DM
    HORTSCIENCE, 2003, 38 (03) : 357 - 360