Green roof ecosystem services in various urban development types: A case study in Graz, Austria

被引:12
|
作者
Hoeben, Annechien Dirkje [1 ]
Posch, Alfred [1 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Syst Sci Innovat & Sustainabil Res, Merangasse 18-1, A-8010 Graz, Austria
关键词
Block development; Geographic information systems (GIS); Historical perimeter block development; Row development; Spatial analysis; Urban ecosystem services (UESs); HEALTH-BENEFITS; HEAT-ISLAND; HYDROLOGICAL PERFORMANCE; BLUE SPACES; POLLUTION; CHALLENGES; MITIGATION; EXPOSURE; CLIMATE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127167
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In this paper, we describe how different urban development types and environmental conditions could affect the broad distribution of green roofs in Graz (Austria). A GIS-based mapping method was applied along the lines of four ecosystem services (i.e., regulation of microclimate temperature regulation, support of air quality improvement support, stormwater retention and biodiversity enhancement). The results are rather positive and indicate that green roofs are fit on 87 % of the investigated roof area (172 out of 203 buildings) based on roof dimensions and constructional measures. Among the investigated roof area, 63 % was classified as having a 'high need' for greening and, thus, a need to generate ecosystem services in urban environments. These results present a paradox: Roofs on block and row development are more appropriate for greening purposes than roofs on historical perimeter block development, but the latter is often found in environments where green roofs are needed more (i.e., inner-city centres). Therefore, city planners should consider using different greening strategies for distinct urban development types under diverse environmental conditions and prioritise the greening actions accordingly. These findings may be relevant in other historically grown, centrally compact European cities.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urban Ecosystem Services: Advancements in Urban Green Development
    Russo, Alessio
    Cirella, Giuseppe T.
    LAND, 2023, 12 (03)
  • [2] Urban vulnerability and adaptation to heatwaves: a case study of Graz (Austria)
    Reischl, Christiane
    Rauter, Romana
    Posch, Alfred
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (01) : 63 - 75
  • [3] Assessing the Ecosystem Services of Various Types of Urban Green Spaces Based on i-Tree Eco
    Song, Peihao
    Kim, Gunwoo
    Mayer, Audrey
    He, Ruizhen
    Tian, Guohang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [4] Unveiling the cultural ecosystem services of urban green spaces: A case study of Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Smrekar, Ales
    Tiran, Jernej
    Horvat, Katarina Polajnar
    ACTA GEOGRAPHICA SLOVENICA-GEOGRAFSKI ZBORNIK, 2024, 64 (03)
  • [5] Ecosystem services of urban green sites- A case study from Eastern Himalayan foothills
    Pradhan, Ricky
    Manohar, Abha K.
    Vineeta
    Sarkar, Biplov C.
    Bhat, Jahangeer A.
    Shukla, Gopal
    Chakravarty, Sumit
    TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE, 2020, 2
  • [6] Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces: A case study in Gwacheon, Republic of Korea
    Ko, Hajung
    Son, Yonghoon
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 91 : 299 - 306
  • [7] Plant Functional Traits Predict Green Roof Ecosystem Services
    Lundholm, Jeremy
    Tran, Stephanie
    Gebert, Luke
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (04) : 2366 - 2374
  • [8] Green roof substrates influencing the provision of ecosystem services: A review
    Farah, Georgio
    Pérez, Gabriel
    Ballesta, Astrid
    El Bachawati, Makram
    Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2024, 12 (06):
  • [9] Ecosystem services management: An evaluation of green adaptations for urban development in Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Zinia, Naeema Jihan
    McShane, Paul
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 173 : 23 - 32
  • [10] Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study
    Jari Niemelä
    Sanna-Riikka Saarela
    Tarja Söderman
    Leena Kopperoinen
    Vesa Yli-Pelkonen
    Seija Väre
    D. Johan Kotze
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19 : 3225 - 3243