A novel flood risk mapping approach with machine learning considering geomorphic and socio-economic vulnerability dimensions

被引:45
|
作者
Deroliya, Prakhar [1 ]
Ghosh, Mousumi [2 ]
Mohanty, Mohit P. [1 ,3 ]
Ghosh, Subimal [2 ,4 ]
Rao, K. H. V. Durga [6 ]
Karmakar, Subhankar [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Environm Sci & Engn Dept, Mumbai 400076, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Interdisciplinary Program Climate Studies, Mumbai 400076, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol Roorkee, Dept Water Resources Dev & Management, Roorkee 247667, Uttaranchal, India
[4] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mumbai 400076, India
[5] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Urban Sci & Engn, Mumbai 400076, India
[6] Indian Space Res Org, Natl Remote Sensing Ctr, Disaster Management Support Grp, Hyderabad, India
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; Flood risk assessment; Flood susceptibility mapping; Geomorphic approach; Supervised learning; Vulnerability mapping; SPATIAL PREDICTION; SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT; GIS; DELINEATION; MODELS; PROTECTION; FRAMEWORK; CHINA; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Quantifying flood hazards by employing hydraulic/hydrodynamic models for flood risk mapping is a widely implemented non-structural flood management strategy. However, the unavailability of multi-domain and multi-dimensional input data and expensive computational resources limit its application in resource-constrained regions. The fifth and sixth IPCC assessment reports recommend including vulnerability and exposure components along with hazards for capturing risk on human-environment systems from natural and anthropogenic sources. In this context, the present study showcases a novel flood risk mapping approach that considers a combination of geomorphic flood descriptor (GFD)-based flood susceptibility and often neglected socio-economic vulnerability components. Three popular Machine Learning (ML) models, namely Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient-boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), are evaluated for their abilities to combine digital terrain model-derived GFDs for quantifying flood susceptibility in a flood-prone district, Jagatsinghpur, located in the lower Mahanadi River basin, India. The area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) along with Cohen's kappa are used to identify the best ML model. It is observed that the RF model performs better compared to the other two models on both training and testing datasets, with AUC score of 0.88 on each. The socio-economic vulnerability assessment follows an indicator-based approach by employing the Charnes-Cooper-Rhodes (CCR) model of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), an efficient non-parametric ranking method. It combines the district's relevant socio-economic sensitivity and adaptive capacity indicators. The flood risk classes at the most refined administrative scale, i.e., village level, are determined with the Jenks natural breaks algorithm using flood susceptibility and socio-economic vulnerability scores estimated by the RF and CCR-DEA models, respectively. It was observed that > 40 % of the villages spread over Jagatsinghpur face high and very high flood risk. The proposed novel framework is generic and can be used to derive a wide variety of flood susceptibility, vulnerability, and subsequently risk maps under a data-constrained scenario. Furthermore, since this approach is relatively data and computationally parsimonious, it can be easily implemented over large regions. The exhaustive flood maps will facilitate effective flood control and floodplain planning.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A new bivariate risk classifier for flood management considering hazard and socio-economic dimensions
    Mohanty, Mohit Prakash
    Vittal, H.
    Yadav, Vinay
    Ghosh, Subimal
    Rao, Goru Srinivasa
    Karmakar, Subhankar
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 255 (255)
  • [2] COVID-19 Risk Mapping with Considering Socio-Economic Criteria Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Razavi-Termeh, Seyed Vahid
    Sadeghi-Niaraki, Abolghasem
    Farhangi, Farbod
    Choi, Soo-Mi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (18)
  • [3] Socio-economic vulnerability and losses of flood in Lampung, Indonesia
    Chayyani, N. R.
    Gravitiani, E.
    Suryanto
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE 2019 (4TH ICCC 2019), 2020, 423
  • [4] Mapping the Socio-Economic Vulnerability in Aceh to Reduce the Risk of Natural Disaster
    Nooraeni, Rani
    Yudho, Nugroho Puspito
    Pramana, Setia
    8TH ANNUAL BASIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: COVERAGE OF BASIC SCIENCES TOWARD THE WORLD'S SUSTAINABILITY CHALLANGES, 2018, 2021
  • [5] Using Machine Learning to Determine the Efficacy of Socio-Economic Indicators as Predictors for Flood Risk in London
    Gau, Grace
    Singh, Minerva
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2024, 81 (01): : 427 - 443
  • [6] Hazard and vulnerability in urban flood risk mapping: Machine learning techniques and considering the role of urban districts
    Eini, Mohammad
    Kaboli, Hesam Seyed
    Rashidian, Mohsen
    Hedayat, Hossein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 50
  • [7] ON FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ACROSS SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTS
    Ni, Weihong
    Henshaw, Kira
    Zhu, Wei
    Wang, Jing
    Hu, Maoqi
    Constantinescu, Corina
    ANALES DEL INSTITUTO DE ACTUARIOS ESPANOLES, 2020, (26): : 71 - 102
  • [8] SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS OF WORLD'S RISK SOCIETY
    Delic, Zlatan
    4TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ECONOMY OF INTEGRATION (ICEI 2015): CHALLENGES OF ECONOMY IN ENVIRONMENT UNDER CRISIS, 2015, : 614 - 627
  • [9] Incorporating socio-economic factors into roadway flood risk vulnerability analysis using geo spatial model
    Parra Saad, Alejandro
    Sanabria Buitrago, Mayerling
    Sanabria, Ricardo
    Pineros Duenas, Karol Natalia
    INVESTIGACIONES GEOGRAFICAS-SPAIN, 2024, (81): : 201 - 223
  • [10] Spatial analysis of socio-economic and demographic factors influencing urban flood vulnerability
    Islam, Md Tazmul
    Meng, Qingmin
    JOURNAL OF URBAN MANAGEMENT, 2024, 13 (03) : 437 - 455