Measuring Success through Outcome Indicators for Restoration Efforts in Louisiana

被引:0
|
作者
Kar, Devyani [1 ]
Rhode, Rachel [1 ]
Snider, Natalie Peyronnin [1 ]
Robichaux, Estelle [2 ]
机构
[1] Environm Def Fund, Washington, DC 20009 USA
[2] COMPASS, Portland, OR USA
关键词
Coastal restoration; Coastal Master Plan; Louisiana land-loss; project prioritization; project evaluation; SEDIMENT DIVERSION; WETLANDS; PHASE;
D O I
10.2112/SI95-219.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Louisiana is at the forefront of confronting multi-faceted challenges due to coastal land-loss and climate change. These challenges include loss of culture and economy for humans as well as loss of ecosystem functions and habitats for the socio-ecological system. To best mitigate and adapt to these challenges in the near-term, the Restore the Mississippi River Delta ( MRD) -- a consortium of five nonprofit organizations with a shared goal of restoration of coastal Louisiana -- identified 17 projects from Louisiana's Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast ( 2017 Coastal Master Plan or CMP) through a streamlined prioritization process. Prioritization of these projects were based on criteria including the project's scale and synergies, enhancement of ecosystem services, contributions to species diversity and abundance, resilience to coastal flooding, sustainability, and feasibility of implementation. To gauge the progress in the implementation of chosen projects, outcome indicators were developed for coastal restoration via scientific research, expert opinion, and defensible assumptions. A detailed methodology was formulated where up-to-date information for each project was collected, converted into measurable scores calculated annually through a comprehensive evaluation-tracking tool. The criteria for "success" of each project was based on actual scores meeting the target scores (calculated from projection of the project's annual progress during the project's life cycle). Scoring methods were analyzed and reported yearly on and improvements and strategies formulated for underperforming projects.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1133
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Learning from scientific literature: Can indicators for measuring success be standardized in "on the ground" restoration?
    Evju, Marianne
    Hagen, Dagmar
    Kyrkjeeide, Magni O.
    Kohler, Berit
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2020, 28 (03) : 519 - 531
  • [2] Ecological indicators for stream restoration success
    Pander, Joachim
    Geist, Juergen
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 30 : 106 - 118
  • [3] Romanian enterprise found its way to success through measuring indicators
    Ohota, Adina Andreea
    INNOVATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: A GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE, VOLS 1-4, 2011, : 604 - 608
  • [4] Restoration success of backfilling canals in coastal Louisiana marshes
    Baustian, Joseph J.
    Turner, R. Eugene
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2006, 14 (04) : 636 - 644
  • [5] Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts
    Shackelford, Nancy
    Paterno, Gustavo B.
    Winkler, Daniel E.
    Erickson, Todd E.
    Leger, Elizabeth A.
    Svejcar, Lauren N.
    Breed, Martin F.
    Faist, Akasha M.
    Harrison, Peter A.
    Curran, Michael F.
    Guo, Qinfeng
    Kirmer, Anita
    Law, Darin J.
    Mganga, Kevin Z.
    Munson, Seth M.
    Porensky, Lauren M.
    Quiroga, R. Emiliano
    Torok, Peter
    Wainwright, Claire E.
    Abdullahi, Ali
    Bahm, Matt A.
    Ballenger, Elizabeth A.
    Barger, Nichole
    Baughman, Owen W.
    Becker, Carina
    Lucas-Borja, Manuel Esteban
    Boyd, Chad S.
    Burton, Carla M.
    Burton, Philip J.
    Calleja, Eman
    Carrick, Peter J.
    Caruana, Alex
    Clements, Charlie D.
    Davies, Kirk W.
    Deak, Balazs
    Drake, Jessica
    Dullau, Sandra
    Eldridge, Joshua
    Espeland, Erin
    Farrell, Hannah L.
    Fick, Stephen E.
    Garbowski, Magda
    de la Riva, Enrique G.
    Golos, Peter J.
    Grey, Penelope A.
    Heydenrych, Barry
    Holmes, Patricia M.
    James, Jeremy J.
    Jonas-Bratten, Jayne
    Kiss, Reka
    NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2021, 5 (09) : 1283 - +
  • [6] Measuring the success of wildlife community restoration
    McCoy, ED
    Mushinsky, HR
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2002, 12 (06) : 1861 - 1871
  • [7] Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts
    Nancy Shackelford
    Gustavo B. Paterno
    Daniel E. Winkler
    Todd E. Erickson
    Elizabeth A. Leger
    Lauren N. Svejcar
    Martin F. Breed
    Akasha M. Faist
    Peter A. Harrison
    Michael F. Curran
    Qinfeng Guo
    Anita Kirmer
    Darin J. Law
    Kevin Z. Mganga
    Seth M. Munson
    Lauren M. Porensky
    R. Emiliano Quiroga
    Péter Török
    Claire E. Wainwright
    Ali Abdullahi
    Matt A. Bahm
    Elizabeth A. Ballenger
    Nichole Barger
    Owen W. Baughman
    Carina Becker
    Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja
    Chad S. Boyd
    Carla M. Burton
    Philip J. Burton
    Eman Calleja
    Peter J. Carrick
    Alex Caruana
    Charlie D. Clements
    Kirk W. Davies
    Balázs Deák
    Jessica Drake
    Sandra Dullau
    Joshua Eldridge
    Erin Espeland
    Hannah L. Farrell
    Stephen E. Fick
    Magda Garbowski
    Enrique G. de la Riva
    Peter J. Golos
    Penelope A. Grey
    Barry Heydenrych
    Patricia M. Holmes
    Jeremy J. James
    Jayne Jonas-Bratten
    Réka Kiss
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2021, 5 : 1283 - 1290
  • [8] Water quality of a coastal Louisiana swamp and how dredging is undermining restoration efforts
    Lane, Robert R.
    Huang, Haosheng
    Day, John W.
    Justic, Dubravko
    DeLaune, Ronald D.
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2015, 152 : 23 - 32
  • [9] Measuring the Outcome of Reintroduction Efforts for an Endangered Butterfly
    Cabrera, Steele S.
    Hunt, T. S.
    Haddad, N. M.
    Lucky, A.
    Daniels, J. C.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 60 : E223 - E223
  • [10] Salt marsh restoration: an overview of techniques and success indicators
    Md Masum Billah
    Md Khurshid Alam Bhuiyan
    Mohammad Ahsanul Islam
    Jewel Das
    ATM Rafiqul Hoque
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 15347 - 15363