On using ethical theories to teach engineering ethics

被引:11
|
作者
Bouville, Mathieu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Mat Res & Engn, Singapore 117602, Singapore
[2] Inst High Performance Comp, Singapore 117528, Singapore
关键词
egoism; ethics education; Immanuel Kant; moral reasoning; philosophy; professional ethics; utilitarianism;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-007-9034-5
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Many engineering ethics classes and textbooks introduce theories such as utilitarianism and Kantianism (and most others draw from these theories without mentioning them explicitly). Yet using ethical theories to teach engineering ethics is not devoid of difficulty. First, their status is unclear (should one pick a single theory or use them all? does it make a difference?) Also, textbooks generally assume or fallaciously 'prove' that egoism (or even simply accounting for one's interests) is wrong. Further, the drawbacks of ethical theories are underestimated and the theories are also otherwise misrepresented to make them more suitable for engineering ethics as the authors construe it, viz. the 'moral reasoning' process. Stating in what various theories disagree would allow the students to frame the problem more productively in terms of motive-consequence or society-individual dichotomies rather than in terms of Kant-utilitarian.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 120
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条