Paradigm shifts in radiation biology: Their impact on intervention for radiation-induced disease

被引:46
|
作者
Brooks, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ Tri Cities, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1667/RR3324.1
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
New mechanistic cell and molecular studies on the effects of very low doses of radiation have resulted in three major paradigm shifts. First, the observation of bystander effects demonstrated that non-hit cells may respond as well as cells in which energy is deposited. Second, it was thought that gene mutations and chromosome aberrations were the most important early changes that represented the initiation phase of radiation-induced cancer. Now genomic instability that leads to the loss of genetic control appears to play a major role in the development of cancer. Finally, recent studies have demonstrated that radiation-induced changes in gene expression can be demonstrated at very low radiation doses. These changes can result in alterations in response pathways, many of which appear to be involved in protective or adaptive responses. The demonstration that unique genes are up- and down-regulated depending on the radiation type, dose and dose rate suggests that different molecular mechanisms are involved in responses to high and low radiation doses. The ability to alter radiation response by physical and chemical treatments suggests that it may be possible to intervene in the progression of radiation-induced diseases. Such intervention may decrease the cancer risk from radiation exposure. This new research also demonstrates that many nonlinear biological processes have an impact on the induction of cancer and the shape of dose-response functions. Thus, for low-LET radiation delivered at low dose rates, the linear, no-threshold hypothesis is not well supported, but it is adequately conservative in protecting against low-dose radiation risks.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 461
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vanguards of paradigm shift in radiation biology: Radiation-induced adaptive and bystander responses
    Matsumoto, Hideki
    Hamada, Nobuyuki
    Takahashi, Akihisa
    Kobayashi, Yasuhiko
    Ohnishi, Takeo
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2007, 48 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [2] Pathology and biology of radiation-induced cardiac disease
    Tapio, Soile
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2016, 57 (05) : 439 - 448
  • [3] BIOLOGY OF RADIATION-INDUCED CANCER
    LOUTIT, JF
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1964, 114 (A2) : 816 - +
  • [4] Potential Targets for Intervention in Radiation-Induced Heart Disease
    Boerma, M.
    Hauer-Jensen, M.
    CURRENT DRUG TARGETS, 2010, 11 (11) : 1405 - 1412
  • [5] Radiation-induced lung disease and the impact of radiation methods on imaging features
    Park, KJ
    Chung, JY
    Chun, MS
    Suh, JH
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2000, 20 (01) : 83 - 98
  • [6] RADIATION-INDUCED DISEASE
    BOBROW, M
    CIBA FOUNDATION SYMPOSIA, 1993, 175 : 182 - 196
  • [7] Biology of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury
    Roy, Soumyajit
    Salerno, Kilian E.
    Citrin, Deborah E.
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [8] THE BIOLOGY OF RADIATION-INDUCED CARDIAC DAMAGE
    Hoving, S.
    Seemann, I.
    Gabriels, K.
    Visser, N.
    te Poele, J.
    Heeneman, S.
    Daemen, M.
    Stewart, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 : S11 - S11
  • [9] Classical radiation biology dogma, bystander effects and paradigm shifts
    Waldren, CA
    HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2004, 23 (02) : 95 - 100
  • [10] Possible Intervention Strategies to Reduce Radiation-induced Heart Disease
    Hoving, S.
    Seemann, I.
    Gabriels, K.
    Visser, N. L.
    Poele, J. A. Te
    Heeneman, S.
    Daemen, M. J.
    Stewart, F. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S4 - S5