Review of Life Cycle Assessments for Steel and Environmental Analysis of Future Steel Production Scenarios

被引:32
|
作者
Suer, Julian [1 ,2 ]
Traverso, Marzia [1 ]
Jaeger, Nils [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Sustainabil Civil Engn, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe AG, D-47166 Duisburg, Germany
关键词
life cycle assessment; recycling; direct reduced iron; electric arc furnace; hydrogen; ELECTRIC-ARC FURNACE; DIRECT REDUCED IRON; BLAST-FURNACE; DIRECT REDUCTION; NATURAL-GAS; ENERGY-EFFICIENCY; WASTE PLASTICS; HYDROGEN; SIMULATION; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/su142114131
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The steel industry is focused on reducing its environmental impact. Using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, the impacts of the primary steel production via the blast furnace route and the scrap-based secondary steel production via the EAF route are assessed. In order to achieve environmentally friendly steel production, breakthrough technologies have to be implemented. With a shift from primary to secondary steel production, the increasing steel demand is not met due to insufficient scrap availability. In this paper, special focus is given on recycling methodologies for metals and steel. The decarbonization of the steel industry requires a shift from a coal-based metallurgy towards a hydrogen and electricity-based metallurgy. Interim scenarios like the injection of hydrogen and the use of pre-reduced iron ores in a blast furnace can already reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions up to 200 kg CO2/t hot metal. Direct reduction plants combined with electrical melting units/furnaces offer the opportunity to minimize GHG emissions. The results presented give guidance to the steel industry and policy makers on how much renewable electric energy is required for the decarbonization of the steel industry.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Steel merchant bars life cycle analysis and environmental product declaration: an overview of different scenarios
    Landra, G. B.
    METALLURGIA ITALIANA, 2016, (10): : 27 - 33
  • [2] VALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE CYCLE COST OF STEEL PRODUCTION - CASE STUDY
    Janik, Agnieszka
    METAL 2015: 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METALLURGY AND MATERIALS, 2015, : 1951 - 1956
  • [3] Comparing environmental impacts of beef production systems: A review of life cycle assessments
    de Vries, M.
    van Middelaar, C. E.
    de Boer, I. J. M.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2015, 178 : 279 - 288
  • [4] Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) analysis of structural steel members for the environmental impact assessment of steel buildings
    Zygomalas, I.
    Efthymiou, E.
    Baniotopoulos, C. C.
    PORTUGAL SB10: SUSTAINABLE BUILDING AFFORDABLE TO ALL - LOW COST SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION, 2010, : 655 - 662
  • [5] Exergy analysis of the life cycle of steel
    Centre for Environmental Strategy, Univ. of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 5XH, Surrey, United Kingdom
    Energy, 3 (213-220):
  • [6] Exergy analysis of the life cycle of steel
    Michaelis, P
    Jackson, T
    Clift, R
    ENERGY, 1998, 23 (03) : 213 - 220
  • [7] Review and meta-analysis of recent life cycle assessments of hydrogen production
    Wilkinson, Julian
    Mays, Tim
    McManus, Marcelle
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 9
  • [8] Handling of Multi-Functionality in Life Cycle Assessments for Steel Mill Gas Based Chemical Production
    Thonemann, Nils
    Maga, Daniel
    Petermann, Cornelia
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2018, 90 (10) : 1576 - 1586
  • [9] Future scenarios and life cycle assessment: systematic review and recommendations
    Bisinella, V
    Christensen, T. H.
    Astrup, T. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (11): : 2143 - 2170
  • [10] Future scenarios and life cycle assessment: systematic review and recommendations
    V. Bisinella
    T. H. Christensen
    T. F. Astrup
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 2143 - 2170