Persuasiveness Web 2.0 in Behavioral Intention: A Conceptual Model

被引:0
|
作者
Widyasari, Yohana Dewi Lulu [1 ,2 ]
Nugroho, Lukito Edi [1 ]
Permanasari, Adhistya Erna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Elect Engn & Informat Technol, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] Politekn Caltex Riau, Informat Syst, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
关键词
web; 2.0; persuasive technology; behavior; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; ACCEPTANCE; MEDIA; TOOLS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The use of the web 2.0 technology as a work tool or communication tool in individual activities grow significant and has begun to be also used in the organization. The Web 2.0 technology is not just an information technology system but also a social technology, which is still a debate of factors that can influence it. Aspects of social interaction owned by this technology impact on the behavior and attitude of the users. This research proposes a conceptual model intervention of persuasive technology that explains what the factor affect the users? Behavioral intention to use technology in an organization. This study reviews of the web 2.0 technology by using Theory of Planned Behavior and Behavior Change Support Systems to analysis its persuasiveness. In this research will be tested persuasive system design model that has a significant impact on perceptions of persuasion and system usage. More specifically, the proposed model extends Theory of Planned Behavior with seven constructs namely, Perceived Ease of Use, Attitude Toward The Behavior, Perceived Usefulness, Social Influence, Subjective Norm, Self-Efficacy, Perceived Behavioral Control. This proposed model explain factors that affect the usage of the web 2.0 persuasive technology. It offers opportunities for future research in understanding the acceptance of persuasive technology.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 122
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence Factors to Web2.0 Websites Users' Attitude and Behavioral Intention
    Fang, Zhiyuan
    Xiao, Meiyan
    Jie, Yang
    Shao Zixuan
    ICEBE 2009: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 553 - 558
  • [2] Using Web 2.0 to Conduct Qualitative Research: A Conceptual Model
    Thacker, Christopher
    Dayton, David
    TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2008, 55 (04) : 383 - 391
  • [3] A Conceptual Model for Behavioral Intention of the Elderly to Use Internet Services in Iran
    Houshangi, Tina
    Woods, Peter
    Tee, Sim Hui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL SYSTEMS AND MULTIMEDIA (VSMM), 2016, : 217 - 220
  • [4] Study on the conceptual model of precision Internet marketing in the age of web2.0
    Du, Lanying
    Han, Qing
    Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-4: MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A GLOBAL WORLD, 2007, : 2260 - 2265
  • [5] The Web 2.0 business model and a Web 2.0 enterprise: Google
    Tarcsi, Adam
    2007 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LOGISTICS AND INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2007, : 127 - 130
  • [6] A conceptual model for the web
    Liu, MC
    Ling, TW
    CONCEPTUAL MODELING ER 2000, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 1920 : 225 - 238
  • [7] Undergraduates' behavioral intention to use indigenous Chinese Web 2.0 tools in informal English learning: Combining language learning motivation with technology acceptance model
    Fan, Cunying
    Wang, Juan
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [8] Undergraduates’ behavioral intention to use indigenous Chinese Web 2.0 tools in informal English learning: Combining language learning motivation with technology acceptance model
    Cunying Fan
    Juan Wang
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [9] A Conceptual Model of Nurses' Turnover Intention
    Smokrovic, Eva
    Kizivat, Tomislav
    Bajan, Antun
    Solic, Kresimir
    Gvozdanovic, Zvjezdana
    Farcic, Nikolina
    Zvanut, Bostjan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (13)
  • [10] Factors influencing the continuance intention to the usage of Web 2.0: An empirical study
    Chen, Shih-Chih
    Yen, David C.
    Hwang, Mark I.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 28 (03) : 933 - 941