Results of a survey among GP practices on how they manage patient safety aspects related to point-of-care testing in every day practice

被引:8
|
作者
de Vries, Claudette [1 ]
Doggen, Carine [2 ]
Hilbers, Ellen [1 ]
Verheij, Robert [3 ]
IJzerman, Maarten [2 ]
Geertsma, Robert [1 ]
Kusters, Ron [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Hlth Protect, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, MIRA Inst Biomed Technol & Tech Med, Hlth Technol & Serv Res, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Clin Chem & Haematol Lab, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE | 2015年 / 16卷
关键词
AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENTS POINT; GENERAL-PRACTICE TRIAL; RESPONSE RATES; QUALITY; PROGRAM; ERROR; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-014-0217-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Point-of-care (POC) tests are devices or test strips that can be used near or at the site where care is delivered to patients, enabling a relatively fast diagnosis. Although many general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands are using POC tests in their practice, little is known on how they manage the corresponding patient safety aspects. Methods: To obtain information on this aspect, an invitation to participate in a web-based questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 750 GP practices. Of this sample 111 GP practices returned a complete questionnaire. Data was analysed by using descriptive statistics. Results: Results show that there is not always attention for quality control measures such as checking storage conditions, executing calibration, and maintenance. In addition, universal hygienic measures, such as washing hands before taking a blood sample, are not always followed. Refresher courses on the use of POC tests are hardly organized. Only a few of the GPs contact the manufacturer of the device when a device failure occurs. Well-controlled aspects include patient identification and actions taken when ambiguous test results are obtained. Conclusions: We observed a number of risks for errors with POC tests in GP practices that may be reduced by proper training of personnel, introduction of standard operating procedures and measures for quality control and improved hygiene. To encourage proper use of POCT in general practices, a national POCT guideline, dedicated to primary care and in line with ISO standards, should be introduced.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Results of a survey among GP practices on how they manage patient safety aspects related to point-of-care testing in every day practice
    Claudette de Vries
    Carine Doggen
    Ellen Hilbers
    Robert Verheij
    Maarten IJzerman
    Robert Geertsma
    Ron Kusters
    BMC Family Practice, 16
  • [2] Point-of-care information in GP practices: Results of a survey among German GP specialists and GP trainees
    Halder, Julian
    Zirngibl, Isabella
    Joos, Stefanie
    Foerster, Christian
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 172 : 92 - 99
  • [3] Patient Preferences for Point-of-Care Testing Survey Validation and Results
    Lilly, Craig M.
    Ensom, Emily
    Teebagy, Sean
    DiMezza, Danielle
    Dunlap, Denise
    Hafer, Nathaniel
    Buchholz, Bryan
    McManus, David
    POINT OF CARE, 2020, 19 (04): : 112 - 115
  • [4] Variation in the use of point-of-care ultrasound in general practice in various European countries. Results of a survey among experts
    Mengel-Jorgensen, Troels
    Jensen, Martin Bach
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (04) : 274 - 277
  • [5] Point of care d-dimer testing in practice: Survey results for d-dimer testing performed in patient care within the United Kingdom
    Brown, L.
    Kitchen, D. P.
    Jennings, I.
    Munroe-Peart, S.
    Kitchen, S.
    Woods, T. A. L.
    Walker, I. D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2016, 173 : 53 - 53
  • [6] "It was difficult to offer same day results": evaluation of community-based point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections among youth using the GeneXpert platform in Zimbabwe
    Martin, Kevin
    Chikwari, Chido Dziva
    Mackworth-Young, Constance R. S.
    Chisenga, Mutsawashe
    Bandason, Tsitsi
    Dauya, Ethel
    Olaru, Ioana D.
    Francis, Suzanna C.
    Mavodza, Constancia
    Nzombe, Portia
    Nyamwanza, Rangarirayi
    Hove, Fadzanai
    Tshuma, Maureen
    Machiha, Anna
    Kranzer, Katharina
    Ferrand, Rashida A.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [7] “It was difficult to offer same day results”: evaluation of community-based point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections among youth using the GeneXpert platform in Zimbabwe
    Kevin Martin
    Chido Dziva Chikwari
    Constance R. S. Mackworth-Young
    Mutsawashe Chisenga
    Tsitsi Bandason
    Ethel Dauya
    Ioana D. Olaru
    Suzanna C. Francis
    Constancia Mavodza
    Portia Nzombe
    Rangarirayi Nyamwanza
    Fadzanai Hove
    Maureen Tshuma
    Anna Machiha
    Katharina Kranzer
    Rashida A. Ferrand
    BMC Health Services Research, 22