Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants

被引:59
|
作者
Friesen, LM [1 ]
Shannon, RV [1 ]
Cruz, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] House Ear Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
cochlear implants; high rate stimulation; speech recognition; speech processing;
D O I
10.1159/000084027
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Phoneme and speech recognition were measured as a function of stimulation pulse rate in 12 listeners with three types of cochlear implants. Identification of consonants and vowels and recognition of words and sentences were measured in 5 Clarion C1 subjects fit with continuous interleaved sampling ( CIS) processors having 4 or 8 electrodes, 4 Nucleus 24 subjects fit with CIS processors having 4, 8, 12 or 16 electrodes and 3 Clarion C2 subjects fit with CIS processors with 4, 8, 12 and 16 electrodes. Stimulation rates ranged from 200 to more than 5000 Hz per electrode, depending on the device, number of electrodes used and stimulation strategy. Listeners were also tested on the same materials with their original processor prior to receiving the experimental processors. All testing was done in quiet listening conditions with essentially no practice with the experimental processor prior to data collection. Listeners scored the highest with their original processor. Little difference in speech understanding was observed for listener scores with processors using different stimulation rates. Speech recognition was significantly poorer only at the lowest stimulation rate and at high rates that used noninterleaved pulses. Speech recognition was similar for processors using 8, 12 or 16 electrodes. Only 4- electrode processors produced a significantly poorer performance. These results suggest that patients with present commercial implants are not able to make full use of the number of channels of spectral information delivered by the present speech processors. In addition, the results show no significant change in performance as a function of stimulation rate, suggesting that high stimulation rates do not result in improved access to temporal cues in speech, at least under quiet listening conditions. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 184
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants
    Arora, Komal
    Dawson, Pam
    Dowell, Richard
    Vandali, Andrew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 48 (08) : 561 - 567
  • [2] Effects of stimulation rate on modulation detection and speech recognition by cochlear implant users
    Arora, Komal
    Vandali, Andrew
    Dowell, Richard
    Dawson, Pam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2011, 50 (02) : 123 - 132
  • [3] Speech Recognition Performance in Children with Cochlear Implants Using Bimodal Stimulation
    S. B. Rathna Kumar
    P. Mohanty
    S. G. R. Prakash
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2010, 62 : 342 - 345
  • [4] Speech Recognition Performance in Children with Cochlear Implants Using Bimodal Stimulation
    Kumar, S. B. Rathna
    Mohanty, P.
    Prakash, S. G. R.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 62 (04) : 342 - 345
  • [5] Effects of Pulse Width, Pulse Rate and Paired Electrode Stimulation on Psychophysical Measures of Dynamic Range and Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implants
    Bonnet, Raymond M.
    Boermans, Peter-Paul B. M.
    Avenarius, Otto F.
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2012, 33 (04): : 489 - 496
  • [6] BETTER SPEECH RECOGNITION WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    WILSON, BS
    FINLEY, CC
    LAWSON, DT
    WOLFORD, RD
    EDDINGTON, DK
    RABINOWITZ, WM
    NATURE, 1991, 352 (6332) : 236 - 238
  • [7] Dichotic speech recognition with cochlear implants
    Wesarg, T.
    Arndt, S.
    Alballaa, A. S.
    Rauch, A-K
    Laszig, R.
    Aschendorff, A.
    Speck, I
    HNO, 2019, 67 (10) : 769 - 777
  • [8] Effects of the acoustical dynamic range on speech recognition with cochlear implants
    Cosendai, G
    Pelizzone, M
    AUDIOLOGY, 2001, 40 (05): : 272 - 281
  • [9] Cochlear Implants in Adults: Effects of Age and Duration of Deafness on Speech Recognition
    Beyea, Jason A.
    McMullen, Kyle P.
    Harris, Michael S.
    Houston, Derek M.
    Martin, Jennifer M.
    Bolster, Virginia A.
    Adunka, Oliver F.
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (09) : 1238 - 1245
  • [10] SPEECH RECOGNITION EXPERIENCE WITH MULTICHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    PARKIN, JL
    EDDINGTON, DK
    ORTH, JL
    BRACKMANN, DE
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1985, 93 (05) : 639 - 645