Temporal loudness weights: Primacy effects, loudness dominance and their interaction

被引:1
|
作者
Fischenich, Alexander [1 ]
Hots, Jan [2 ]
Verhey, Jesko [2 ]
Guldan, Julia [1 ]
Oberfeld, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Psychol, Mainz, Germany
[2] Otto von Guericke Univ, Dept Expt Audiol, Magdeburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 12期
关键词
INTENSITY; SOUND; DISCRIMINATION; LEVEL; MODEL; PERCEPTION; DURATION; MASKING;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0261001
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Loudness judgments of sounds varying in level across time show a non-uniform temporal weighting, with increased weights assigned to the beginning of the sound (primacy effect). In addition, higher weights are observed for temporal components that are higher in level than the remaining components (loudness dominance). In three experiments, sounds consisting of 100- or 475-ms Gaussian wideband noise segments with random level variations were presented and either none, the first, or a central temporal segment was amplified or attenuated. In Experiment 1, the sounds consisted of four 100-ms segments that were separated by 500-ms gaps. Previous experiments did not show a primacy effect in such a condition. In Experiment 2, four- or ten-100-ms-segment sounds without gaps between the segments were presented to examine the interaction between the primacy effect and level dominance. As expected, for the sounds with segments separated by gaps, no primacy effect was observed, but weights on amplified segments were increased and weights on attenuated segments were decreased. For the sounds with contiguous segments, a primacy effect as well as effects of relative level (similar to those in Experiment 1) were found. For attenuation, the data indicated no substantial interaction between the primacy effect and loudness dominance, whereas for amplification an interaction was present. In Experiment 3, sounds consisting of either four contiguous 100-ms or 475-ms segments, or four 100-ms segments separated by 500-ms gaps were presented. Effects of relative level were more pronounced for the contiguous sounds. Across all three experiments, the effects of relative level were more pronounced for attenuation. In addition, the effects of relative level showed a dependence on the position of the change in level, with opposite direction for attenuation compared to amplification. Some of the results are in accordance with explanations based on masking effects on auditory intensity resolution.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Temporal Loudness Weights Are Frequency Specific
    Fischenich, Alexander
    Hots, Jan
    Verhey, Jesko
    Oberfeld, Daniel
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [2] Evaluation of a model of temporal weights in loudness judgments
    Oberfeld, Daniel
    Jung, Lorenz
    Verhey, Jesko L.
    Hots, Jan
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 144 (02): : EL119 - EL124
  • [3] Temporal weights in loudness: Investigation of the effects of background noise and sound level
    Fischenich, Alexander
    Hots, Jan
    Verhey, Jesko
    Oberfeld, Daniel
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):
  • [4] The effect of silent gaps on temporal weights in loudness judgments
    Fischenich, Alexander
    Hots, Jan
    Verhey, Jesko L.
    Oberfeld, Daniel
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 395
  • [5] Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination and the form of the loudness function
    Buus, S
    Florentine, M
    Poulsen, T
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 101 (02): : 669 - 680
  • [6] Temporal loudness weights for sounds with increasing and decreasing intensity profiles
    Ponsot, Emmanuel
    Susini, Patrick
    Saint Pierre, Guillaume
    Meunier, Sabine
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 134 (04): : EL321 - EL326
  • [7] TEMPORAL EFFECTS IN SIMULTANEOUS MASKING AND LOUDNESS
    ZWICKER, E
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1965, 38 (01): : 132 - &
  • [8] Spatial weights in loudness judgements
    Hots, Jan
    Oberfeld, Daniel
    Verhey, Jesko L.
    ACTA ACUSTICA, 2024, 8
  • [9] EAR DOMINANCE EFFECTS IN LOUDNESS FOLLOWING AUDITORY ADAPTATION
    DAVIS, JM
    WEILER, E
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1977, 62 : S2 - S2
  • [10] Effects of expectations on loudness and loudness difference
    Scott Parker
    Julianne M. Moore
    Sara Bahraini
    Kathleen Gunthert
    Debra A. Zellner
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2012, 74 : 1334 - 1342