Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) Results Calculated With and Without Bone Mineral Density Values for the Evaluation of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia

被引:6
|
作者
Imerci, Ahmet [1 ]
Kilinc, Cem Yalin [1 ]
Aydogan, Nevres Hurriyet [1 ]
Karalezli, Mustafa Nazim [1 ]
Savran, Ahmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Fac Med, Karamehmet Mah 19 Sokak 10,A Blok Daire 9 Mentese, Mugla, Turkey
[2] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Dept Hand Surg, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Bone mineral density; fracture; FRAX (R); osteopenia; treatment threshold; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; T-SCORES; PREDICTION; BMD; FRAX(A(R)); AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between fracture risk predictions based on calculations made with and without bone mineral density (BMD) values using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX (R)) in Turkish postmenopausal women with osteopenia and to compare the treatment recommendations. This descriptive, cross-sectional study included postmenopausal women aged 50-79 yr with a diagnosis of osteoporosis who were not receiving any treatment. A questionnaire was administered to the participants face-to-face to obtain sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and fracture history. Fracture risk was calculated with FRAX (R) separately with and without BMD. The study included 230 postmenopausal patients with osteopenia. The mean age of the patients was determined as 63.16 +/- 7.59 yr, and the mean body mass index was 30.61 +/- 5.02. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of the 10-yr major osteoporotic (MO) fracture and hip fracture score agreement with FRAX (R) with and without BMD were mean 0.486 and 0.462, respectively. The risk of MO fracture with an intervention threshold of >= 20 was determined in 227/230 patients (98.7%), and the risk of hip fracture with treatment recommendations of >= 3 was determined in 204/230 patients (88.7%). Treatment recommendations in patients with no fracture history and secondary osteoporosis were 100% for MO fracture and 94.7% (123/130) for hip fracture risk. The treatment recommendation rates of FRAX (R) with and without BMD were similar for the majority of postmenopausal women with osteopenia. The agreement between the values was of a moderate level. When patients with a fracture history and secondary osteoporosis were excluded, the agreement increased. Even though values with BMD are of basic importance for medical treatment in postmenopausal women, the use of measurements evaluating fracture risk, such as FRAX (R) without BMD, could be useful in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 471
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPACT OF OSTEOPENIA IN FRACTURE RISK AND IN RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATED BY FRAX
    Horvath, C.
    Hosszu, E.
    Svebis, M.
    Tabak, A.
    Bors, K.
    Csupor, E.
    Meszaros, S.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 30 : S664 - S665
  • [2] Utility of Spine Bone Mineral Density in Fracture Prediction within the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX).
    Blackburn, Tristan
    Howard, Diantha
    Leib, Edward S.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2012, 64 (10): : S835 - S835
  • [3] ASSESSMENT OF FRACTURE RISK IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS BY FRAX SCORE WITHOUT BONE MINERAL DENSITY
    Elsharkawy, Magdy
    Emara, Ahmed
    Elbraky, Abdelrahman
    Abdelmegied, Shaimaa Zaki
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 38 : I974 - I974
  • [4] Predictive value of FRAX tool in evaluation of fracture risk in postmenopausal women in Poland
    Horst-Sikorska, W.
    Dytfeld, J.
    Ignaszak-Szczepaniak, M.
    Gowin, E.
    BONE, 2009, 44 (02) : S393 - S394
  • [5] FRAX(TM) (Fracture risk assessment): WHO Tool supports a more targeted Assessment of Fracture Risk even without Bone Density Measurement
    Resch, H.
    JOURNAL FUR MINERALSTOFFWECHSEL, 2009, 16 (02): : 65 - 65
  • [6] CORRELATION BETWEEN OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE RISK IN 10 YEARS CALCULATED BY FRAX WITH AND WITHOUT BONE DENSITOMETRY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL BRAZILIAN WOMEN
    Costa-Paiva, Lucia S.
    Bastos, Yasmin
    Borges, Luiza
    Baccaro, Luiz F.
    Pedro, Adriana O.
    Pinto-Neto, Aarao M.
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2015, 22 (12): : 1394 - 1394
  • [7] Is It Possible to Increase the Clinical Effectiveness of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Osteopenia Patients by Taking Into Account Bone Mineral Density Values?
    Park, Jin-Sung
    Lee, Jaewon
    Park, Ye-Soo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2016, 19 (03) : 340 - 345
  • [8] COMPARISON OF FRACTURE RISK BY FRAX WITH AND WITHOUT BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES
    Carrazco Chapa, A.
    Lopez Serna, K. M.
    Alvarez-Gonzalez, O. E.
    Mendieta Pedraza, A.
    Martinez Rodriguez, M. C.
    Medina Castillo, J.
    Skinner Taylor, C. M.
    Riega-Torres, J. C.
    Negrete Lopez, R.
    Galarza-Delgado, D. A.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2023, 82 : 1841 - 1841
  • [9] FRACTURE RISK BY FRAX WITH AND WITHOUT BONE MINERAL DENSITY, COMPARISON OF FACTORS AFFECTING CONCORDANCE
    Lujano Negrete, A. Y.
    Taylor, C. M. Skinner
    Perez Barbosa, L.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, M. C.
    Aguilar-Leal, A.
    Espinosa Banuelos, L. G.
    Cardenas, A.
    Galarza-Delgado, D. A.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 1640 - 1640
  • [10] Determination of Fracture Risk in a Hemodialysis Unit in Ecuador Using the FRAX Tool without Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
    Navarro, Ana Yadira
    Perez, Ailiyomar
    Lino, Ricardo J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 35 (10):