Measuring nanoparticles size distribution in food and consumer products: a review

被引:107
|
作者
Calzolai, L. [1 ]
Gilliland, D. [1 ]
Rossi, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Commiss European Communities, DG Joint Res Ctr, Inst Hlth & Consumer Protect, Ispra, VA, Italy
来源
FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT | 2012年 / 29卷 / 08期
关键词
method validation; metals; packaging; water; beverages; FIELD-FLOW FRACTIONATION; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; LIGHT-SCATTERING; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/19440049.2012.689777
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Nanoparticles are already used in several consumer products including food, food packaging and cosmetics, and their detection and measurement in food represent a particularly difficult challenge. In order to fill the void in the official definition of what constitutes a nanomaterial, the European Commission published in October 2011 its recommendation on the definition of 'nanomaterial'. This will have an impact in many different areas of legislation, such as the European Cosmetic Products Regulation, where the current definitions of nanomaterial will come under discussion regarding how they should be adapted in light of this new definition. This new definition calls for the measurement of the number-based particle size distribution in the 1-100nm size range of all the primary particles present in the sample independently of whether they are in a free, unbound state or as part of an aggregate/agglomerate. This definition does present great technical challenges for those who must develop valid and compatible measuring methods. This review will give an overview of the current state of the art, focusing particularly on the suitability of the most used techniques for the size measurement of nanoparticles when addressing this new definition of nanomaterials. The problems to be overcome in measuring nanoparticles in food and consumer products will be illustrated with some practical examples. Finally, a possible way forward (based on the combination of different measuring techniques) for solving this challenging analytical problem is illustrated.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1193
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring consumer response to food products
    Garber, LL
    Hyatt, EM
    Starr, RG
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (01) : 3 - 15
  • [2] Detection, quantification and derivation of number size distribution of silver nanoparticles in antimicrobial consumer products
    Cascio, Claudia
    Geiss, Otmar
    Franchini, Fabio
    Ojea-Jimenez, Isaac
    Rossi, Francois
    Gilliland, Douglas
    Calzolai, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2015, 30 (06) : 1255 - 1265
  • [3] Measuring consumer emotional response and acceptance to sustainable food products
    Yang, Qian
    Shen, Yuchi
    Foster, Tim
    Hort, Joanne
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 131
  • [4] Response to "Measuring consumer response to food products". Sensory tests that predict consumer acceptance
    Wansink, B
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [5] Private label food products: Consumer perception and distribution strategies
    Sgroi, Filippo
    Salamone, Paolo Alberto
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2022, 8
  • [6] Consumer willingness to pay for traceable food products: a scoping review
    Vriezen, Rachael
    Plishka, Mikayla
    Cranfield, John
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2023, 125 (05): : 1631 - 1665
  • [7] Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review
    Alsubhi, Moosa
    Blake, Miranda
    Nguyen, Tan
    Majmudar, Ishani
    Moodie, Marj
    Ananthapavan, Jaithri
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [8] Commentary on Garber et al. Measuring consumer response to food products
    Marshall, D
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [9] Solicited commentary to Garber et al: Measuring consumer response to food products
    Buck, D
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (01) : 37 - 38
  • [10] PRODUCTS LIABILITY AND THE FOOD CONSUMER
    Shulman, Harry
    NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 1953, 47 (06) : 931 - 933