Quality of Care of Medical Imaging Services at a Teaching Hospital in Ghana: Clients' Perspective

Background: The Ministry of Health of Ghana is committed to delivering client-focused, quality-driven, and results-oriented medical imaging services. However, there remained a lack of empirical evidence regarding the state of the various dimensions of quality needed to establish evidence-based strategies to strengthen the medical imaging system. This study assessed the quality of care of medical imaging services from clients' perspective at a teaching hospital in order to inform policy. Methods: This research was a descriptive cross-sectional study using a mixed method approach based on the dimensions of quality of care in medical imaging: capacity and sustainability, timeliness, safety, equity, patient centeredness, and effective communication. Quantitative Method: A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used. A total of 191 clients aged >= 18 years were recruited during medical imaging services at the imaging department of the hospital. A simple random sampling technique was used to select participants. Data were analyzed using Stata version 13. Descriptive analyses were carried out. Qualitative Methods: Purposive sampling strategy was applied to recruit 12 in-depth interview participants. Reflective interview guide starting with demographic characteristics and followed by the dimensions of quality of care was used. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative Results: Overall, there is low quality of care 2.8 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.6). There is low quality with regards to timeliness 2.8 (SD = 0.4), patient centeredness 2.7 (SD = 0.7), equity 2.8 (SD = 0.2), effective communication 2.7 (SD = 0.7), and safety 2.5 (SD = 0.3). Quality of care in relation to capacity and sustainability is high 3.4 (0.6). Only 73 (38.2%) of the clients are currently satisfied with the quality of care, and only 39.8% will recommend others to access care at the imaging department. Only 66 (34.6%) of clients are of the view that staff behavior instills confidence. Qualitative Results: The qualitative study shows a lack of equity, timeliness, and patient-centeredness in terms of care and privacy. There is a perceived lack of compliance with radiation protection protocols, and there exist wide communication gaps between clients and staff. Furthermore, there is a lack of capacity and sustainability in relation to the reliability and availability of functional equipment. There is, however, high appraisal from clients regarding the neatness and availability of staff. Conclusion: A majority of clients are not satisfied with the quality of care of the medical imaging services. Improved interaction with clients, availability of functional equipment, and effective communication during the care process between the patients and the imaging professionals such as provision of timely information during the waiting period and explanation of procedure will help enhance the quality of care.