Comparative outcome of induced labor by intracervical Foley catheter with misoprostol versus misoprostol alone

被引:6
|
作者
Priyadarshini, Apala [1 ]
Jaiswar, Shyam P. [1 ]
Singh, Apoorva [1 ]
Singh, Swati [1 ]
机构
[1] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Foley catheter; labor induction; misoprostol; INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; INDUCTION; COMBINATION; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.2217/cer-2018-0077
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: To evaluate the comparative outcome of induced labor by intracervical Foley catheter with misoprostol versus misoprostol alone. Materials & methods: A total of 1306 women were enrolled over 4 years, induced with either intracervical Foley with misoprostol or misoprostol alone and compared in terms of induction-delivery interval, mode of delivery, the presence of uterine tachysystole, postpartum hemorrhage and perinatal outcome. Results: Induction to delivery interval, the duration between induction to active labor was significantly reduced, deliveries within 24h were significantly higher and the number of misoprostol doses used was significantly less in Foley with misoprostol group. Conclusion: The outcome of combination of intracervical Foley catheter and misoprostol is superior for labor induction, without affecting maternal or perinatal outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 60
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
    Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides
    Araujo, Bruna de Aguiar
    Volpato, Lia Karina
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2023, 69 (01): : 119 - 123
  • [2] Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter–intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone
    A. Babatunde Ande
    C. Michael Ezeanochie
    N. Biodun Olagbuji
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 285 : 967 - 971
  • [3] Progress of labor in women induced with misoprostol versus the Foley catheter
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Keegan, Mary B.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Roehl, Kimberly
    Macones, George A.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (03) : 237.e1 - 237.e7
  • [4] Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone
    Ande, A. Babatunde
    Ezeanochie, C. Michael
    Olagbuji, N. Biodun
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (04) : 967 - 971
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol alone versus misoprostol plus foley catheter for induction of labor in term pregnancies
    Williams, Justin
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S444 - S444
  • [6] Comparison of intracervical foley catheter plus oral misoprostol with oral misoprostol alone for cervical ripening in primigravidas at term
    Nasir, S.
    Chaudhry, R.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 : 12 - 13
  • [7] Oral misoprostol versus combination of foley bulb catheter and oral misoprostol alone for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial
    Graham, Kyle
    Maiuyen Nguyen
    Sit, Anita
    Morfin, Jussely
    Garabedian, Matthew
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S254 - S255
  • [8] Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Howard Hao
    Huang, Ben-Shian
    Cheng, Min
    Yeh, Chang-Ching
    Lin, I-Chia
    Horng, Huann-Cheng
    Huang, Hsin-Yi
    Lee, Wen-Ling
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (06)
  • [9] Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening
    Chen, Wenhang
    Xue, Jing
    Gaudet, Laura
    Walker, Mark
    Wen, Shi Wu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 129 (03) : 193 - 198
  • [10] Progress of labor in women induced with misoprostol vs the Foley catheter
    ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : 91 - 91