Minimum effective dose of midazolam for sedation of mechanically ventilated neonates

被引:22
|
作者
Treluyer, JM
Zohar, S
Rey, E
Hubert, P
Iserin, F
Jugie, M
Lenclen, R
Chevret, S
Pons, G
机构
[1] Univ Paris 05, Hop Necker Enfants Malad, AP HP, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 07, INSERM, U717, Hop St Louis,AP HP,Dept Biostat & Informat Med, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 05, AP HP, Hop Cochin St Vincent de Paul, Paris, France
关键词
continual reassessment method; dose-finding study; midazolam; neonates; stopping rules for decision making;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2710.2005.00678.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the minimal effective dose (MED) of intravenous midazolam, required for appropriate sedation in 95% of patients, 1 h after drug administration. Methods: A double-blind dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method, a Bayesian sequential design. Twenty-three newborn infants hospitalized in intensive care unit participated. Inclusion criteria were: (i) post-natal age < 28 days, (ii) gestational age > 33 weeks, (iii) intubation and ventilatory support required for respiratory distress syndrome, (iv) need for sedation (i.e. one of the six following criteria: agitation or grimacing or crying facial expression before tracheal suctioning, agitation or grimacing or crying facial expression during tracheal suctioning). Each neonate was allocated to a loading dose, ranging from 75 to 200 mu g/kg, and a maintenance dose ranging from 37.5 to 100 mu g/kg/h. Results: The primary endpoint was the level of sedation 1 h after the onset of infusion. The sedation procedure was classified as a success if all the following clinical criteria were met: no agitation, no grimacing and no crying facial expression before as well as during tracheal suctioning. Based on the 23 patients, the final estimated probability of success was 76.9% (95% credibility interval: 56.6-91.4%) for the 200 mu g/kg loading dose. No significant adverse effect was observed. Conclusions: Continual reassessment is a new approach, suitable for dose-finding study in neonates. This method overcomes some of the ethical, statistical and practical problems associated with this population. Using this method, the MED was estimated to be the 200 mu g/kg loading dose of midazolam.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 485
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remifentanil/midazolam versus fentanyl/midazolam for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated neonates and young infants: a randomized controlled trial
    Welzing, Lars
    Oberthuer, Andre
    Junghaenel, Shino
    Harnischmacher, Urs
    Stuetzer, Hartmut
    Roth, Bernhard
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 (06) : 1017 - 1024
  • [2] Remifentanil/midazolam versus fentanyl/midazolam for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated neonates and young infants: a randomized controlled trial
    Lars Welzing
    Andre Oberthuer
    Shino Junghaenel
    Urs Harnischmacher
    Hartmut Stützer
    Bernhard Roth
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2012, 38 : 1017 - 1024
  • [3] SEDATION OF MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS IN THE ITU - COMPARISON OF ISOFLURANE WITH MIDAZOLAM
    KONG, KL
    WILLATTS, SM
    PRYSROBERTS, C
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 61 (01) : P115 - P116
  • [4] Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children: Few Concerns
    Satvir Singh
    Daisy Khera
    Krishna Mohan Gulla
    Rakesh Lodha
    Indian Pediatrics, 2021, 58 (7) : 690 - 690
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children: Few Concerns
    Singh, Satvir
    Khera, Daisy
    Gulla, Krishna Mohan
    Lodha, Rakesh
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2021, 58 (07) : 690 - 690
  • [6] Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gulla, Krishna Mohan
    Sankar, Jhuma
    Jat, Kana Ram
    Kabra, Sushil Kumar
    Lodha, Rakesh
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2021, 58 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [7] Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Krishna Mohan Gulla
    Jhuma Sankar
    Kana Ram Jat
    Sushil Kumar Kabra
    Rakesh Lodha
    Indian Pediatrics, 2021, 58 : 117 - 122
  • [8] PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF MIDAZOLAM SEDATION IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED NEWBORN BABIES
    JACQZAIGRAIN, E
    DAOUD, P
    BURTIN, P
    DESPLANQUES, L
    BEAUFILS, F
    LANCET, 1994, 344 (8923): : 646 - 650
  • [9] ADVANTAGES OF REMIFENTANIL VERSUS INTERMITTENT BOLUSES OF MIDAZOLAM/TRAMADOL SEDATION FOR MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS
    Malenkovic, V.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 : 190 - 190
  • [10] Sedation in the mechanically ventilated patient
    Kress, John P.
    Hall, Jesse B.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (10) : 2541 - 2546