Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Is Feasible With High Completion Rates, Low Complications, and Acceptable Patient Outcomes

被引:10
|
作者
Skaznik-Wikiel, Malgorzata E. [1 ]
Lesnock, Jamie L. [1 ]
Mcbee, William C. [1 ]
Beriwal, Sushil [2 ]
Zorn, Kristin K. [1 ]
Richard, Scott D. [1 ]
Krivak, Thomas C. [1 ]
Edwards, Robert P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer; Intravenous chemotherapy; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; PHASE-II TRIAL; INTRAVENOUS PACLITAXEL; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; CONSOLIDATION THERAPY; COMPLETE REMISSION; CISPLATIN; CARCINOMA; CARBOPLATIN;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0b013e318234f833
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Three large randomized clinical trials have shown a survival benefit for patients treated with intraperitoneal (IP) compared with intravenous chemotherapy for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, the use of IP chemotherapy in recurrent EOC is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes, completion rates, and frequency of complications in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC treated with IP chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective, single-institution analysis of women who received IP chemotherapy for recurrent EOC from January 2003 to April 2010 was conducted. Study patients were identified from the Tumor Registry and office records. Demographic factors, stage, histology, surgical findings, cytoreduction status, and subsequent therapies were abstracted. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Fifty-six women who received IP chemotherapy for their first EOC recurrence were identified. The mean age of patients was 56.7 years (range, 40-79 y). Fifty-five patients (98.3%) had previously completed at least 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. Of all patients, 87.5% were initially diagnosed with advanced stage disease (stage IIA-IV). All patients underwent secondary cytoreduction at the time of IP port placement. Moreover, 67.9% of patients were considered optimally cytoreduced (< 1 cm residual disease) at the end of the secondary debulking surgery. Forty-two patients (75%) were able to successfully complete at least 6 cycles of IP chemotherapy. Reasons for noncompletion were disease progression, allergic reaction, renal failure, pain, severe nausea and vomiting, death, and patient refusal. Six patients (10.7%) developed port complications including pain around port site, port malfunction, and port erosion into small bowel. Median PFS since the initiation of IP chemotherapy was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval, 7.5-16.4 months) and median OS was 51 months (95% confidence interval, 40.8-61.1 months). Conclusions: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a feasible option for patients with recurrent EOC, with high completion rates, low frequency of complications, and acceptable PFS and OS.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 237
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer appears efficacious with high completion rates and low complications
    Skaznik-Wikiel, M.
    Lesnock, J.
    McBee, W.
    Taylor, S.
    Beriwal, S.
    Smith, A.
    Zorn, K.
    Richard, S.
    Krivak, T.
    Edwards, R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) : S30 - S30
  • [2] IS INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RECURRENT EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER FEASIBLE?
    Park, S.
    Nguyen, T.
    Johns, A.
    Adetuyi, O.
    Lin, P.
    Hakim, A.
    Dellinger, T.
    Leong, L.
    Cristea, M.
    Morgan, R.
    Wakabayashi, M.
    Han, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (09) : 319 - 319
  • [3] Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A review of complications and completion rates
    Landrum, Lisa M.
    Gold, Michael A.
    Moore, Kathleen N.
    Myers, Tashanna K. N.
    McMeekin, D. S.
    Walker, Joan L.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (02) : 342 - 347
  • [4] Patient factors associated with completion of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Moulton, L. J.
    DeBernardo, R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 : 204 - 205
  • [5] Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
    Chen, Wei-Chun
    Huang, Huei-Jean
    Yang, Lan-Yan
    Pan, Yu-Bin
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    Lin, Cheng-Tao
    Chen, Min-Yu
    Tang, Yun-Hsin
    Chang, Ting-Chang
    Lai, Chyong-Huey
    Chou, Hung-Hsueh
    BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 45 (05) : 821 - 827
  • [6] Completion of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer and catheter-related complications
    Lesnock, Jamie L.
    Richard, Scott D.
    Zorn, Kristin K.
    Krivak, Thomas C.
    Beriwal, Sushil
    Sukumvanich, Paniti
    McBee, William C., Jr.
    Kelley, Joseph L.
    Edwards, Robert P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 116 (03) : 345 - 350
  • [7] Completion rates of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer in a community integrated health care system
    Lazo, I.
    White, K.
    Tucker, L.
    Zaritsky, E.
    Han, L.
    Ciaravino, G.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 139 (01) : 200 - 200
  • [8] Evaluation of non-completion of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Chambers, Laura Moulton
    Son, Ji
    Radeva, Milena
    DeBernardo, Robert
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (06)
  • [9] Investigating outcomes, post-operative complications, and quality of life in patients receiving hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
    Thomas, Alison
    Haltigin, Christopher
    Al-Wahab, Zaid
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 176 : S139 - S139
  • [10] Outcome following Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, the first Egyptian Experience
    Gareer, W. Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 : S540 - S540