Wave Propagation Modeling and Amplitude-Variation-with-Offset Response in a Fractured Coalbed

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Qing-Xi [1 ]
Peng, Su-Ping [1 ]
Du, Wen-Feng [1 ]
Shi, Su-Zhen [1 ]
Gou, Jing-Wei [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, State Key Lab Coal Resources & Mine Safety, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Natl Adm Coal Geol, Geophys Prospecting Inst, Zhuozhou, Peoples R China
来源
ACTA GEOPHYSICA | 2015年 / 63卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
extensive dilatancy anisotropy; amplitude-variation-with-offset response; wave propagation for wave field modeling; reflection coefficient; REFLECTION SEISMIC DATA; GAS SANDS; METHANE; AVO; COEFFICIENTS; ATTENUATION; PARAMETERS; RESERVOIRS; ANISOTROPY; SYMMETRY;
D O I
10.1515/acgeo-2015-0014
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Coalbed methane can be detected employing the amplitude-variation-with-offset technique. However, there are two issues in applying this technique to a coalbed: strong azimuthal anisotropy resulting from high-density fractures, and the seismic response being composed of many or several individual reflections within the coalbed. To overcome these difficulties, we present an exact solution for reflections in extensive dilatancy anisotropy media. First, we build a three-layer model and simulate the wave propagation in this model. Then we derive an exact P-and converted S-wave reflection coefficient equation based on boundary conditions. Finally, substituting given model parameters into the exact equation, we obtain the variation in the reflection coefficient with incidence angle. The results show that the fracture factors, wavelet frequency and thickness of the coalbed have different effects on the reflection coefficient. Furthermore, we create a synthetic seismogram by forward calculation, and the result fits well with results of the exact equation.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 842
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wave Propagation Modeling and Amplitude-Variation-with-Offset Response in a Fractured Coalbed
    Qing-Xi Lin
    Su-Ping Peng
    Wen-Feng Du
    Su-Zhen Shi
    Jing-Wei Gou
    Acta Geophysica, 2015, 63 : 815 - 842
  • [2] Source wavelet and local wave propagation effects on the amplitude-variation-with-offset response of thin-layer models: A physical modeling study
    Assis, Carlos A. M.
    Oliveira, Sergio A. M.
    Missagia, Roseane M.
    de Ceia, Marco A. R.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 82 (04) : N27 - N41
  • [3] Amplitude-variation-with-offset in thermoelastic media
    Hou, Wanting
    Fu, Li-Yun
    Carcione, Jose M.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2023, 88 (01) : MR25 - MR33
  • [4] Amplitude-variation-with-offset, elastic-impedence, and wave-equation synthetics - A modeling study
    Mallick, Subhashis
    GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 72 (01) : C1 - C7
  • [5] Three-term amplitude-variation-with-offset projections
    Ball, Vaughn
    Tenorio, Luis
    Schiott, Christian
    Thomas, Michelle
    Blangy, J. P.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (05) : N51 - N65
  • [7] Bayesian joint residual moveout and amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion
    Saadallah, Yanis
    Buland, Arild
    GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 89 (04) : R329 - R337
  • [8] Amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion based on group sparse regularization
    Xi, Yijun
    Yin, Xingyao
    Liu, Xiaojing
    Feng, Deyong
    Li, Hongmei
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2022, 10 (01): : SA1 - SA14
  • [9] Direct depth-domain Bayesian amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion
    Sengupta, Madhumita
    Zhang, Houzhu
    Zhao, Yang
    Jervis, Mike
    Grana, Dario
    GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 86 (05) : M167 - M176
  • [10] Amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion using P- to S-wave velocity ratio and P-wave velocity
    Chen, Fubin
    Zong, Zhaoyun
    Yang, Yaming
    Gu, Xingyu
    GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 87 (04) : N63 - N74