Does the Presence of an Epiretinal Membrane Alter the Cleavage Plane during Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling?

被引:52
|
作者
Kenawy, Nihal [1 ]
Wong, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stappler, Theodore [1 ]
Romano, Mario R. [1 ]
Das, Ronald A. [1 ]
Hebbar, Gillian [1 ]
Prime, Wendy [3 ]
Heimann, Heinrich [1 ]
Gibran, Syed K. [1 ]
Sheridan, Carl M. [3 ]
Cheung, Yin Him [2 ,3 ]
Hiscott, Paul S. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, St Pauls Eye Unit, Liverpool L7 8XP, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Inst Eye, HBHA Ctr, LKS Fac Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Liverpool, Unit Ophthalmol, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[4] Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Liverpool L7 8XP, Merseyside, England
关键词
MACULAR HOLE SURGERY; BRILLIANT-BLUE-G; GANGLION-CELL NEURITES; INDOCYANINE GREEN; PROLIFERATIVE VITREORETINOPATHY; SELECTIVELY STAINS; REMOVAL; ULTRASTRUCTURE; INTERFACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.024
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether the presence of a clinically and/or microscopically detectable epiretinal membrane (ERM) alters the cleavage plane during internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Design: Retrospective, observational, immunohistochemical study of ILM specimens using archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Participants: Fifty-one patients who had had ILM excision. Methods: Fifty-one ILM specimens peeled during vitrectomy for various etiologies were examined by light microscopy. The removal of ILM was assisted using Trypan blue (n = 30), indocyanine green (n = 7), or brilliant blue G (n = 14). Monoclonal antibodies to glial fibrillary acidic protein and to neurofilament protein were used to detect glial or neuronal cells respectively on the vitreous or retinal surfaces of the ILM. Specimens were divided into 2 groups: ILM peeled for full-thickness macular hole (MH; n = 31) and ILM peeled after removal of clinically detectable ERM (n = 20). Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measure was the localization of immunohistochemical markers to neuronal or glial cells on the vitreous or retinal surfaces of ILM. The secondary outcome measure was the correlation of the results of the primary measure with the dyes used to facilitate ILM peeling. Results: Glial and/or neuronal cells were detected on the retinal surface of the ILM in 10 of 31 (32%) of the MH ILM specimens and in 13 of 20 (65%) of the ILM peeled after ERM excision; the difference was significant (P = 0.02). There was no association between the presence of neuronal and glial cells with the type of dye used (P = 0.2). Of the 23 ILM specimens with cells attached to the retinal surface, 21 (91%) were associated with clinical and/or histologic evidence of ERM and 2 (9%) were not. The correlation between the presence of cells on the vitreous and the retinal surfaces of ILM was high (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The findings suggest that ERM may be associated with sub-ILM changes that alter the plane of separation during ILM peeling. This study does not confirm any influence of dyes on the cleavage plane during surgery. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 320-323 (C) 2010 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / U152
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Peeling the Internal Limiting Membrane in Epiretinal Membrane Surgery
    Boscia, Giacomo
    Viggiano, Pasquale
    Boscia, Francesco
    Gotzaridis, Stratos
    Zampogianni, Androniki
    Zas, Marcelo
    Mendaro, Marcos
    Shroff, Daraius
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING RETINA, 2024, 55 (12):
  • [2] Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
    Zhang, Bowen
    Dong, Xingmei
    Sun, Yi
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (03)
  • [3] Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
    Kwok, AKH
    Lai, TYY
    Yuen, KSC
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 33 (04): : 379 - 385
  • [4] The effect of internal limiting membrane peeling in treatment of idiopathic epiretinal membrane \
    Chang, Y. S.
    Song, S. H.
    Jeong, S. H.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2018, 96 : 20 - 20
  • [5] Effect and risk of internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
    Ryota, Kono
    Mohamed, Yasser Helmy
    Maekawa, Yuki
    Yoneda, Ai
    Kinoshita, Hirohumi
    Yamada, Yoshihisa
    Tsuiki, Eiko
    Fujikawa, Azusa
    Kumagami, Takeshi
    Kitaoka, Takashi
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [6] Internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: a meta-analysis
    Christodoulou, Eleni
    Batsos, Georgios
    Christou, Evita Evangelia
    Paroikakis, Efstratios
    Karagiannis, Dimitrios
    Kontomichos, Lukas
    Stefaniotou, Maria
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2021, 99
  • [7] Standard internal limiting membrane peeling versus internal limiting membrane abrasion technique for primary epiretinal membrane surgery
    Bagci, Fatma
    Citirik, Mehmet
    Dulger, Selda Celik
    Teke, Mehmet Yasin
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2024, 87 (01)
  • [8] Outcomes after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery with or Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling
    Guber, Josef
    Pereni, Ioana
    Scholl, Hendrik P. N.
    Guber, Ivo
    Haynes, Richard J.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2019, 8 (02) : 297 - 303
  • [9] Epiretinal Membrane Peeling with Foveal Sparing of the Internal Limiting Membrane: A Pilot Study
    Russo, Andrea
    Morescalchi, Francesco
    Scaroni, Nicolo
    Gambicorti, Elena
    Costagliola, Ciro
    Semeraro, Francesco
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [10] Anatomical outcomes of epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
    Sheyman, Alan
    Myung, Jane
    Lyu, Teddy
    Wald, Ken
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)