Polynomial equations giving a proper feedback compensator for a strictly proper plant

被引:0
|
作者
Callier, FM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Namur, FUNDP, Dept Math, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
关键词
linear time-invariant unity feedback systems; proper rational plant- and compensator transfer functions; polynomial matrix fractions and -systems;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Our purpose is a review of the polynomial matrix compensator equation XlDr + YlNr = D-k (COMP), (Callier and Desoer, 1982, Section 6.2), (Kucera, 1979; Kucera, 1991), where a) the right-coprime polynomial matrix pair (N-r, D-r) is given by the strictly proper rational plant right matrix-fraction P = NrDr-1, b) Dk is a given nonsingular stable closed-loop characteristic polynomial matrix, and c) (X-l, Y-l) is a polynomial matrix solution pair resulting possibly in a (stabilizing) rational compensator given by the left fraction C = Xl-1Yl. We recall first the class of all polynomial matrix pairs (X-l, Y-l) solving (COMP) and then single out those pairs which result in a proper rational compensator. An important role is hereby played by the assumptions that a) the plant denominator D-r is column-reduced (Wolovich, 1974), (Kailath, 1980), and b) the closed-loop characteristic matrix Dk is row-column-reduced (Callier and Desoer, 1982) ( e.g. monically diagonally degree dominant (Rosenbrock and Hayton, 1978), (Zagalak and Kucera, 1985)). This (using the information of (Callier and Desoer, 1982, pp.187-192)) allows to get all solution pairs (X-l, Y-l) giving a proper compensator with row-reduced denominator X-l having a priori prescribed (sufficiently large) row degrees as in (Kucera and Zagalak, 1999) and (Callier, 2000). Copyright (C) 2001 IFAC.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 158
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROPER FEEDBACK COMPENSATORS FOR A STRICTLY PROPER PLANT BY POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS
    Callier, Frank M.
    Kraffer, Ferdinand
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2005, 15 (04) : 493 - 507
  • [2] Simultaneous stabilization of two plants with a strictly proper compensator
    Fonte, C
    Zasadzinski, M
    Bernier-Kazantsev, C
    ROBUST CONTROL DESIGN 2000, VOLS 1 & 2, 2000, 1-2 : 373 - 378
  • [3] Feedback analysis for non-strictly-proper systems
    Cobb, D
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2001, : 2932 - 2936
  • [4] POLE ASSIGNMENT OF STRICTLY PROPER AND PROPER LINEAR-SYSTEMS BY CONSTANT OUTPUT-FEEDBACK
    GIANNAKOPOULOS, C
    KARCANIAS, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1985, 42 (03) : 543 - 565
  • [5] On strictly proper equilibria
    Jansen, MJM
    Vermeulen, AJ
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1996, 88 (01) : 123 - 137
  • [6] Giving proper credit
    Schulz, William G.
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2007, 85 (11) : 35 - 38
  • [7] Giving proper acknowledgment
    Shokat, KM
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2003, 81 (39) : 2 - 2
  • [8] Generalization of feedback error learning (FEL) to strictly proper MIMO systems
    AlAli, Basel
    Hirata, Kentaro
    Sugimoto, Kenji
    2006 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2006, 1-12 : 356 - +
  • [9] On the computation and parametrization of proper denominator assigning compensators for strictly proper plants
    Antoniou, E. N.
    Vardulakis, A. I. G.
    IMA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL CONTROL AND INFORMATION, 2005, 22 (01) : 12 - 25
  • [10] Choosing a Strictly Proper Scoring Rule
    Merkle, Edgar C.
    Steyvers, Mark
    DECISION ANALYSIS, 2013, 10 (04) : 292 - 304