Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry in post-LASIK eyes for myopia

被引:12
|
作者
Al-Mezaine, Hani S. [1 ]
Al-Amro, Saleh A. [1 ]
Kangave, Dustan [2 ]
Al-Obeidan, Saleh [1 ]
Al-Jubair, Khaled M. [3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Riyadh 11321, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Res Dept, Riyadh 11321, Saudi Arabia
[3] Natl Guard Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Corneal thickness; Laser in situ keratomileusis; Pachymetry; Pentacam; Ultrasound; NONCONTACT SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; ANTERIOR-CHAMBER DEPTH; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; ORBSCAN-II; SCHEIMPFLUG PHOTOGRAPHY; OCULUS PENTACAM; REPEATABILITY; PACHOMETRY; OXYBUPROCAINE;
D O I
10.1177/112067211002000507
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained using the Pentacam Scheimpflug system with those obtained using DGH ultrasound pachymetry (UP) in post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes for myopia. METHODS. In a prospective study, measurement agreement was assessed in 143 eyes of 72 post-LASIK patients using both the Pentacam and UP at the Eye Consultants Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. RESULTS. The mean CCT was 522+/-42.2 mu m with the Oculus Pentacam and 516.2+/-40.6 mu m with UP. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean +/-SD for the differences between the 2 devices was 5.8+/-13.6 mu m, with 95% confidence interval limits ranging from -20.9 mu m to 32.6 mu m. A test of statistical significance indicated that the mean differences of 5.8+/-13.6 mu m differed significantly from zero (p<0.001; Wilcoxon signed-rank test), thus indicating that the Pentacam measurements tended to overestimate CCT compared with UP. Analysis of regression showed a high correlation between the values obtained with both devices (r=0.947, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS. In post-LASIK myopic eyes, although a high correlation has been shown between Pentacam and UP measurements, Pentacam tends to overestimate CCT compared to UP. Pentacam probably cannot be used interchangeably with UP in post-LASIK eyes for myopia. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2010; 20: 852-7)
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 857
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Pentacam, noncontact specular microscope, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes
    Al-Ageel, Saleh
    Al-Muammar, Abdulrahman M.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 23 (3-4) : 181 - 187
  • [2] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry and OCULUS Pentacam
    Buyuk, Kursat
    Bozkurt, Banu
    Kamis, Umit
    Ozkagnici, Ahmet
    Okudan, Suleyman
    TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 41 (02): : 104 - 107
  • [3] Central corneal thickness measurements in unoperated eyes and eyes after PRK for orbscan II and myopia using pentacam, ultrasonic pachymetry
    Kim, Sun Woong
    Byun, Yeo Jue
    Byun, Yeo Jue
    Kim, Eung Kweon
    Kim, Taeim
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 23 (09) : 888 - 894
  • [4] Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry
    Al-Mezaine H.S.
    Al-Amro S.A.
    Kangave D.
    Sadaawy A.
    Wehaib T.A.
    Al-Obeidan S.
    International Ophthalmology, 2008, 28 (5) : 333 - 338
  • [5] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement by scanning slit topography, infrared, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes
    Ho, Wing-cheung
    Lam, Philip Tsze-ho
    Chiu, Thomas Yee-hang
    Yim, Mandy Ching-man
    Lau, Fion Tung-ching
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 40 (11) : 2913 - 2921
  • [6] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement by scanning slit topography, infrared, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes
    Wing-cheung Ho
    Philip Tsze-ho Lam
    Thomas Yee-hang Chiu
    Mandy Ching-man Yim
    Fion Tung-ching Lau
    International Ophthalmology, 2020, 40 : 2913 - 2921
  • [7] Agreement of post-LASIK corneal power and corneal thickness measurements by pentacam and GALILEI corneal tomography systems
    Hsieh, Yun-Hsiu
    Weng, Tzu-Heng
    Chou, Yu-Ching
    Wu, Kuan-Liang
    Liang, Chang-Min
    Tai, Ming-Cheng
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 82 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [8] Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes
    Wu, Wenjing
    Wang, Yan
    Xu, Lulu
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 252 (01) : 91 - 99
  • [9] Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbscan slit-scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes
    Chakrabarti, HS
    Craig, JP
    Brahma, A
    Malik, TY
    McGhee, CNJ
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (11): : 1823 - 1828
  • [10] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Ultrasonic Pachymetry and Orbscan II Corneal Topography and Evaluation of Ultrasonic Pachymetry Repeatability
    Demir, Semra Tiryaki
    Odabasi, Mahmut
    Oba, Mehmet Ersin
    Dirim, Ayse Burcu
    Can, Efe
    Kara, Orhan
    TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 44 (04): : 263 - 267