Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study

被引:19
|
作者
Zhou, Zhen-Xu [1 ]
Zhao, Li-Ying [1 ]
Lin, Tian [1 ]
Liu, Hao [1 ]
Deng, Hai-Jun [1 ]
Zhu, Heng-Liang [1 ]
Yan, Jun [1 ]
Li, Guo-Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
Laparoscopic surgery; Locally advanced rectal cancer; Oncologic outcomes; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; OPEN RESECTION; SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To evaluate the 5-year survival after laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery for stages. and. rectal cancer. METHODS: This study enrolled 406 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stages. and. rectal cancer between January 2000 and December 2009 [laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR), n = 152; open rectal resection (ORR), n = 254]. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, pathological outcomes, postoperative recovery, and 5-year survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Most of the clinical characteristics were similar except age (59 years vs 55 years, P = 0.033) between the LRR group and ORR group. The proportion of anterior resection was higher in the LRR group than that in the ORR group (81.6% vs 66.1%, P = 0.001). The LRR group had less estimated blood loss (50 mL vs 200 mL, P < 0.001) and a lower rate of blood transfusion (4.6% vs 11.8%, P = 0.019) compared to the ORR group. The pathological outcomes of the two groups were comparable. The LRR group was associated with faster recovery of bowel function (2.8 d vs 3.7 d, P < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.7 d vs 13.7 d, P < 0.001). The median followup time was 63 mo in the LRR group and 65 mo in the ORR group. As for the survival outcomes, the 5-year local recurrence rate (16.0% vs 16.4%, P = 0.753), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate (63.0% vs 63.1%, P = 0.589), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (68.1% vs 63.5%, P = 0.682) were comparable between the LRR group and the ORR group. Stageby stage, there were also no statistical differences between the LRR group and the ORR group in terms of the 5-year local recurrence rate (stage II : 6.3% vs 8.7%, P = 0.623; stage III : 26.4% vs 23.2%, P = 0.747), 5-year DFS rate (stage II : 77.5% vs 77.6%, P = 0.462; stage III : 46.5% vs 50.9%, P = 0.738), and 5-year OS rate (stage II: 81.4% vs 74.3%, P = 0.242; stage III : 53.9% vs 54.1%, P = 0.459). CONCLUSION: LRR for stages. and. rectal cancer can yield comparable long-term survival while achieving short-term benefits compared to open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:5505 / 5512
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study
    Zhen-Xu Zhou
    Li-Ying Zhao
    Tian Lin
    Hao Liu
    Hai-Jun Deng
    Heng-Liang Zhu
    Jun Yan
    Guo-Xin Li
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, (18) : 5505 - 5512
  • [2] Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Stage I Rectal Cancer: Long-term Oncologic Outcomes
    Seung Duk Lee
    Sung Chan Park
    Ji Won Park
    Dae Yong Kim
    Hyo Seong Choi
    Jae Hwan Oh
    World Journal of Surgery, 2013, 37 : 646 - 651
  • [3] Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Stage I Rectal Cancer: Long-term Oncologic Outcomes
    Lee, Seung Duk
    Park, Sung Chan
    Park, Ji Won
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Choi, Hyo Seong
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (03) : 646 - 651
  • [4] Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Middle and Lower Rectal Cancer
    Li, Shaotang
    Jiang, Feizhao
    Tu, Jingfu
    Zheng, Xiaofeng
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [5] Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer Long-Term Oncologic Results
    Laurent, Christophe
    Leblanc, Fabien
    Wuetrich, Philippe
    Scheffler, Mathieu
    Rullier, Eric
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [6] Long-term and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Aydin, Huseyin Onur
    Ekici, Yahya
    Karakayali, Feza Yarbug
    Tezcaner, Tugan
    Ozgun, Gonca
    Yildirim, Sedat
    Moray, Gokhan
    MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL, 2018, 52 (04): : 285 - 288
  • [7] The meta analysis of pathological and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for rectal cancer
    Ding, Ke-Feng
    Li, Jun
    Cai, Yi-Bo
    Kong, Xiang -Xing
    Yuan, Ying
    Chen, Hai-Yan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [8] Comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes of stage III colorectal cancer following laparoscopic versus open surgery
    Baek, Jeong-Heum
    Lee, Gil-Jae
    Lee, Won-Suk
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2015, 88 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [9] Long-term oncologic outcome after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Agha, Ayman
    Benseler, Volker
    Hornung, Matthias
    Gerken, Michael
    Iesalnieks, Igors
    Fuerst, Alois
    Anthuber, Matthias
    Jauch, Karl-Walter
    Schlitt, Hans J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (04): : 1119 - 1125
  • [10] Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery for transverse colon cancer: a retrospective multicenter study
    Kim, Jong Wan
    Kim, Jeong Yeon
    Kang, Byung Mo
    Lee, Bong Hwa
    Kim, Byung Chun
    Park, Jun Ho
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 2203 - 2209