Luminal-Type Breast Cancer: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients with the Ki-67 Labeling Index

被引:104
|
作者
Mori, Naoko [1 ]
Ota, Hideki [1 ]
Mugikura, Shunji [1 ]
Takasawa, Chiaki [1 ]
Ishida, Takanori [2 ]
Watanabe, Gou [2 ]
Tada, Hiroshi [2 ]
Watanabe, Mika [3 ]
Takase, Kei [1 ]
Takahashi, Shoki [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Sendai, Miyagi 9808574, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg Oncol, Sendai, Miyagi 9808574, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Sendai, Miyagi 9808574, Japan
关键词
INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; PRIMARY THERAPY; WEIGHTED MRI;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.14140283
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the Ki-67 labeling index for luminal- type (estrogen receptor-positive) breast cancer not otherwise specified (NOS) diagnosed by means of biopsy. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Between December 2009 and December 2012, 86 patients with 86 lesions with luminal-type invasive breast cancer NOS underwent magnetic resonance imaging, including dynamic contrast material-enhanced imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging with b values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm(2). Conventional measurement of the minimum and mean ADCs by placing regions of interest and histogram analysis of pixel-based ADC data of the entire tumor were performed by two observers independently and correlated with the Ki-67 labeling index of surgical specimens. Results: For the interobserver reliability, interclass correlation coefficients for all parameters with the exception of the minimum ADC exceeded 0.8, indicating almost perfect agreement. The minimum ADC and mean ADC and the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the histograms showed negative correlations with the Ki-67 labeling index (r = -0.49, -0.55, -0.54, -0.53, and -0.48, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the differential diagnosis between the high-proliferation (Ki67. 14; n = 44) and low-proliferation (Ki-67, 14; n = 42) groups revealed that the most effective threshold for the mean ADC was lower than 1097 x 10(-6) mm(2)/sec, with sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 71%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.81 for the mean ADC. There were no significant differences in the AUC among the parameters. Conclusion: Considering convenience for routine practice, the authors suggest that the mean ADC of the conventional method would be practical to use for estimating the Ki-67 labeling index.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 73
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk stratification in luminal-type breast cancer: Comparison of Ki-67 with EndoPredict test results
    Noske, Aurelia
    Anders, Sophie-Isabelle
    Ettl, Johannes
    Hapfelmeier, Alexander
    Steiger, Katja
    Specht, Katja
    Weichert, Wilko
    Kiechle, Marion
    Klein, Evelyn
    BREAST, 2020, 49 : 101 - 107
  • [2] KI-67 LABELING INDEX IN BREAST-CANCER
    CRISPINO, S
    BRENNA, A
    COLOMBO, D
    FLORES, B
    DAMICO, S
    LISSONI, P
    BARNI, S
    PAOLOROSSI, F
    BRATINA, G
    TANCINI, G
    TUMORI, 1989, 75 (06) : 557 - 562
  • [3] Histological grade as an alternative to the Ki67 labeling index is only available for luminal-type breast cancers
    Hayashi, Satoshi
    Kitada, Masahiro
    Sato, Kazuhiro
    Matsuda, Yoshinari
    Ishibashi, Kei
    Oikawa, Kensuke
    Miyokawa, Naoyuki
    Hirata, Satoshi
    BREAST CANCER, 2014, 21 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [4] Histological grade as an alternative to the Ki67 labeling index is only available for luminal-type breast cancers
    Satoshi Hayashi
    Masahiro Kitada
    Kazuhiro Sato
    Yoshinari Matsuda
    Kei Ishibashi
    Kensuke Oikawa
    Naoyuki Miyokawa
    Satoshi Hirata
    Breast Cancer, 2014, 21 : 47 - 51
  • [5] Ki-67 labeling index by molecular subtype of breast cancer
    Abolins, A.
    Strumfa, I.
    Melbarde-Gorkusa, I.
    Trofimovics, G.
    Miklasevics, E.
    Gardovskis, J.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2011, 459 : S64 - S64
  • [6] Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Grading Meningioma
    Tang, Yi
    Dundamadappa, Sathish K.
    Thangasamy, Senthur
    Flood, Thomas
    Moser, Richard
    Smith, Thomas
    Cauley, Keith
    Takhtani, Deepak
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (06) : 1303 - 1308
  • [7] Apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer: correlation with molecular markers Ki-67, HIF-1 and VEGF
    Ma, Teng
    Yang, Shaolin
    Jing, Haiyan
    Cong, Lin
    Cao, Zhixin
    Liu, Zhiling
    Huang, Zhaoqin
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 31 (03)
  • [8] THYMIDINE LABELING INDEX AND KI-67 GROWTH FRACTION IN BREAST-CANCER - COMPARISON AND CORRELATION WITH PROGNOSIS
    RUDAS, M
    GNANT, MFX
    MITTLBOCK, M
    NEUMAYER, R
    KUMMER, A
    JAKESZ, R
    REINER, G
    REINER, A
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 32 (02) : 165 - 175
  • [9] Ki-67 labeling index as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Jain, Parveen
    Doval, Dinesh Chandra
    Batra, Ullas
    Goyal, Pankaj
    Bothra, Sneha Jatan
    Agarwal, Chaturbhuj
    Choudhary, Dutta Kumardeep
    Yadav, Abhishek
    Koyalla, Venkata Pradeep Babu
    Sharma, Mansi
    Dash, Prashanta
    Talwar, Vineet
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 49 (04) : 329 - 338
  • [10] Interlaboratory variability of Ki-67 labeling index in breast cancer tissue microarrays
    Focke, C. M.
    Glaeser, D.
    Finsterbusch, K.
    Buerger, H.
    Korsching, E.
    Berghaeuser, K-H
    Hinrichs, B.
    Packeisen, J.
    van Diest, P. J.
    Decker, T.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2013, 463 (02) : 264 - 264