A Protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame

被引:151
|
作者
Gould, Rachelle K. [1 ,2 ]
Klain, Sarah C. [3 ]
Ardoin, Nicole M. [4 ,5 ]
Satterfield, Terre [3 ]
Woodside, Ulalia [6 ]
Hannahs, Neil [6 ]
Daily, Gretchen C. [5 ,7 ]
Chan, Kai M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Emmett Interdisciplinary Program Environm & Resou, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Resources & Ctr Conservat Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[4] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Kamehameha Sch Land Assets Div, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Ctr Conservat Biol, Dept Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
British Columbia; deliberative decision making; environmental management; environmental values; Hawaii; social-ecological systems; social science; COASTAL; MATTERS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12407
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Stakeholders' nonmaterial desires, needs, and values often critically influence the success of conservation projects. These considerations are challenging to articulate and characterize, resulting in their limited uptake in management and policy. We devised an interview protocol designed to enhance understanding of cultural ecosystem services (CES). The protocol begins with discussion of ecosystem-related activities (e.g., recreation, hunting) and management and then addresses CES, prompting for values encompassing concepts identified in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) and explored in other CES research. We piloted the protocol in Hawaii and British Columbia. In each location, we interviewed 30 individuals from diverse backgrounds. We analyzed results from the 2 locations to determine the effectiveness of the interview protocol in elucidating nonmaterial values. The qualitative and spatial components of the protocol helped characterize cultural, social, and ethical values associated with ecosystems in multiple ways. Maps and situational, or vignette-like, questions helped respondents articulate difficult-to-discuss values. Open-ended prompts allowed respondents to express a diversity of ecosystem-related values and proved sufficiently flexible for interviewees to communicate values for which the protocol did not explicitly probe. Finally, the results suggest that certain values, those mentioned frequently throughout the interview, are particularly salient for particular populations. The protocol can provide efficient, contextual, and place-based data on the importance of particular ecosystem attributes for human well-being. Qualitative data are complementary to quantitative and spatial assessments in the comprehensive representation of people's values pertaining to ecosystems, and this protocol may assist in incorporating values frequently overlooked in decision making processes.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 586
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Place-Based Approach to Agricultural Nonmaterial Intangible Cultural Ecosystem Service Values
    Petway, Joy R.
    Lin, Yu-Pin
    Wunderlich, Rainer F.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [2] Linking the nonmaterial dimensions of human-nature relations and human well-being through cultural ecosystem services
    Huynh, Lam Thi Mai
    Gasparatos, Alexandros
    Su, Jie
    Lam, Rodolfo Dam
    Grant, Ezekiel, I
    Fukushi, Kensuke
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (31)
  • [3] Reply to Kirchhoff: Cultural values and ecosystem services
    Daniel, Terry C.
    Muhar, Andreas
    Aznar, Olivier
    Boyd, James W.
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Costanza, Robert
    Flint, Courtney G.
    Gobster, Paul H.
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Penker, Marianne
    Ribe, Robert G.
    Spierenburg, Marja
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (46) : E3147 - E3147
  • [4] Aligning Indigenous values and cultural ecosystem services for ecosystem accounting: A review
    Normyle, Anna
    Vardon, Michael
    Doran, Bruce
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 59
  • [5] Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Satterfield, Terre
    Goldstein, Joshua
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 74 : 8 - 18
  • [6] Cultural ecosystem services enabled through work with shellfish
    Michaelis, Adriane K.
    Walton, William C.
    Webster, Donald W.
    Shaffer, L. Jen
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 132
  • [7] Pivotal cultural values of nature cannot be integrated into the ecosystem services framework
    Kirchhoff, Thomas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (46) : E3146 - E3146
  • [8] Ecosystem services, landscape values and cultural sustainability in ecological restoration projects
    Pueyo-Ros, Josep
    DOCUMENTS D ANALISI GEOGRAFICA, 2018, 64 (02): : 291 - 311
  • [9] Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity
    Tengberg, Anna
    Fredholm, Susanne
    Eliasson, Ingegard
    Knez, Igor
    Saltzman, Katarina
    Wetterberg, Ola
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 2 : 14 - 26
  • [10] Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES): Open-source spatial modeling of cultural services
    Sherrouse, Benson C.
    Semmens, Darius J.
    Ancona, Zachary H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2022, 148